By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Driveclub probably would have scored better if it released before Forza Horizon 2.

 

Answer why don't ya?

Agreed! 79 27.62%
 
Disagree! 110 38.46%
 
Driveclub should have bee... 97 33.92%
 
Total:286
Trunkin on 09 October 2014

Just imagine how awesome it would've been if they'd made another motorstorm instead. :(



Around the Network
jlmurph2 on 09 October 2014
TheJimbo1234 said:
Mr Puggsly said:

Well first of all, I don't see many games getting meta scores in the 90s.

It doesn't matter what the public thinks. Reviews are generally done by critics interested in that game or its genre.

Sometimes the public has opinions on something they don't care about or didn't even try. User reviews that we often see on metacritic are basically useless especially if its a game people want to hate.

Look at every multiplat AAA game from last gen. They all receievwed absurdly high scores yet many people disliked them eg. CoD franchise.


The only COD's that were scored in the 90's last gen were the ones that deserved it. COD 4 and MW2. Plenty of people thought they were great.



Goatseye on 09 October 2014
TheJimbo1234 said:

Look at every multiplat AAA game from last gen. They all receievwed absurdly high scores yet many people disliked them eg. CoD franchise.

COD franchise excells in what matters. Gameplay!!

And Blops series are one of the few games that captured my attention with an interesting semi-true story.



TheJimbo1234 on 09 October 2014
Goatseye said:
TheJimbo1234 said:
 

Look at every multiplat AAA game from last gen. They all receievwed absurdly high scores yet many people disliked them eg. CoD franchise.

COD franchise excells in what matters. Gameplay!!

And Blops series are one of the few games that captured my attention with an interesting semi-true story.

 

Yeah, I could tear apart why a game which has dire map design, no change in gameplay, the same (and very poor) graphics, with client hosting servers is never, ever a good game and only shows that the bar people judge with has slipped....but that would be going off topic.

 

Either way, I hope this generation they are far more critical of games simply so they force innovation to occur.



TheFallen on 09 October 2014

Doesn't matter what score a game gets within the 70-100 range. If it's 70 - 80 it just be called mediocre, 80 - 90 will be called good and maybe disappointing, and 90 + will be called overrated. Reviews mean eff all, just play the game for yourself and don't listen to anyone else's opinion.



Around the Network
Mr Puggsly on 09 October 2014
TheJimbo1234 said:
Mr Puggsly said:

Well first of all, I don't see many games getting meta scores in the 90s.

It doesn't matter what the public thinks. Reviews are generally done by critics interested in that game or its genre.

Sometimes the public has opinions on something they don't care about or didn't even try. User reviews that we often see on metacritic are basically useless especially if its a game people want to hate.

Look at every multiplat AAA game from last gen. They all receievwed absurdly high scores yet many people disliked them eg. CoD franchise.

Many people dislike everything and anything that's successful.

I don't know what an absurly high score is to you. I can just tell you relatively few got scores in the 90s.



Recently Completed: 
River City: Rival Showdown for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

Goatseye on 09 October 2014
TheJimbo1234 said:

 

Yeah, I could tear apart why a game which has dire map design, no change in gameplay, the same (and very poor) graphics, with client hosting servers is never, ever a good game and only shows that the bar people judge with has slipped....but that would be going off topic.

 

Either way, I hope this generation they are far more critical of games simply so they force innovation to occur.

You could do all of that and it wouldn't take CODs merit, on being one of the funnest FPSs on the market.

A game can have all the technical prowess graphically but when it can't engage the gamers with its gameplay... it sucks.

Look at Ryse, it even has a well told story.



HokageTenshi on 09 October 2014

don't think so... cause they launch an unfinished game after all even its a year delayed project...



TheJimbo1234 on 09 October 2014
Mr Puggsly said:
TheJimbo1234 said:
Mr Puggsly said:

Well first of all, I don't see many games getting meta scores in the 90s.

It doesn't matter what the public thinks. Reviews are generally done by critics interested in that game or its genre.

Sometimes the public has opinions on something they don't care about or didn't even try. User reviews that we often see on metacritic are basically useless especially if its a game people want to hate.

Look at every multiplat AAA game from last gen. They all receievwed absurdly high scores yet many people disliked them eg. CoD franchise.

Many people dislike everything and anything that's successful.

I don't know what an absurly high score is to you. I can just tell you relatively few got scores in the 90s.


http://www.metacritic.com/browse/games/score/metascore/all/ps3?sort=desc

You sure about that?



Fusioncode on 09 October 2014

Reviewers found the game mediocre. FH2 has nothing to do with that. Though I'm annoyed with some reviewers knocking off points from Driveclub simply because it's not open world.



Sigs are dumb. And so are you!