By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Can PS4 Handle Assassins Creed Unity 1080p? I think not homies

 

Will the Next Assassins Creed be Da Bomb?

Hell yes 42 42.42%
 
Hellz yes homie 56 56.57%
 
Total:98
Zackasaurus-rex on 07 October 2014

*sigh*

It's Toastboy at it again.



http://voteforbernie.org

Around the Network
Dr.Henry_Killinger on 07 October 2014
Bristow9091 said:
Kinda' hoping toastboy gets a permaban sometime, his threads are starting to bore me now, at first they were funny, but now it's just sort of pathetic, like a cry for attention...

Entitled Forum Posters!



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank

Dr.Henry_Killinger on 07 October 2014
Zekkyou said:
the-pi-guy said:
Zekkyou said:
Of course it can. If they're being held back by the CPU, yet still achieving 900p, then if they took the time to offset tasks to the GPU (which will obviously have rather a lot of power floating around if it's the CPU they're stuck at), then 1080p shouldn't be an issue.

To be honest the X1 version should be able to achieve 1080p with the same method.

They were specifically talking about frame rate is being limited by CPU.  

Resolution isn't affected by the CPU so much.  

I know, but i'm giving them the benefit of the doubt that they've honestly maxed out the CPU to the point they can't even properly utilize the GPU in a traditional manner. I'd rather think they were lazy rather than being outright shitty :p Wishful thinking, i know.

PC version will probabaly have terrible optimization. Recommended Specs like 4K Ryse, but it'll look identical to Black Flag.



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank

deskpro2k3 on 07 October 2014

Ubisoft openly said that they kept the ps4 down homie.



CPU: Ryzen 9950X3D
GPU: MSI 4090 SUPRIM X 24G
Motherboard: MSI MEG X670E GODLIKE
RAM: CORSAIR DOMINATOR PLATINUM 32GB DDR5
SSD: Kingston FURY Renegade 4TB
Gaming Console: PLAYSTATION 5 PRO
curl-6 on 07 October 2014
Zekkyou said:
the-pi-guy said:
Zekkyou said:
Of course it can. If they're being held back by the CPU, yet still achieving 900p, then if they took the time to offset tasks to the GPU (which will obviously have rather a lot of power floating around if it's the CPU they're stuck at), then 1080p shouldn't be an issue.

To be honest the X1 version should be able to achieve 1080p with the same method.

They were specifically talking about frame rate is being limited by CPU.  

Resolution isn't affected by the CPU so much.  

I know, but i'm giving them the benefit of the doubt that they've honestly maxed out the CPU to the point they can't even properly utilize the GPU in a traditional manner. I'd rather think they were lazy rather than being outright shitty :p Wishful thinking, i know.

Definitely possible. The CPU is the weakest link in all three current gen systems, so it makes sense it would be the first part to bottleneck, necessitating the GPGPUs to step in and help at the cost of graphical oomph.



Around the Network
thismeintiel on 07 October 2014
Normchacho said:
Ubisofts response is just down right insulting. We know the power gap is there, we've seen it used in other games as recently as Shadow of Mordor where the PS4 version has a significant advantage. Both the specs and results show it.

Ubi is trying to convince us that somehow both the PS4 and Xbox One versions are 900p @30 fps without having to limit the PS4 version in any way. Utter garbage.

Yea, their excuses just come off exactly as they are, damage control.  They say the CPU is limiting them, because of AI.  Well, okay.  Then, does that mean that the AI is going to be the most spectacular AI ever seen?  Nope.  I doubt it'll be much different than the other ACs.  Now they are saying they optimized it to the max on both consoles, yet they are both 900p 30FPS.  So, does that mean that it will be the most beautiful game on the PS4?  Nope.  The vids I have seen do look really good, but I think Infamous:SS looks better, and its pulling off way more effects and runs ~40 FPS on average.  Does that also mean it will look quite a bit better than the One version?  Doubt it.  Maybe a little bit better AA, but for the most part, I bet they will look the same.



 

Normchacho on 07 October 2014
thismeintiel said:
Normchacho said:
Ubisofts response is just down right insulting. We know the power gap is there, we've seen it used in other games as recently as Shadow of Mordor where the PS4 version has a significant advantage. Both the specs and results show it.

Ubi is trying to convince us that somehow both the PS4 and Xbox One versions are 900p @30 fps without having to limit the PS4 version in any way. Utter garbage.

Yea, their excuses just come off exactly as they are, damage control.  They say the CPU is limiting them, because of AI.  Well, okay.  Then, does that mean that the AI is going to be the most spectacular AI ever seen?  Nope.  I doubt it'll be much different than the other ACs.  Now they are saying they optimized it to the max on both consoles, yet they are both 900p 30FPS.  So, does that mean that it will be the most beautiful game on the PS4?  Nope.  The vids I have seen do look really good, but I think Infamous:SS looks better, and its pulling off way more effects and runs ~40 FPS on average.  Does that also mean it will look quite a bit better than the One version?  Doubt it.  Maybe a little bit better AA, but for the most part, I bet they will look the same.


For me the performance isn't the issue, I could even handle parity. What gets me is the awful, awful way they've gone about presenting and then explaining it. Had they just come out and said "AC:U will be 900p @ 30 fps on both the Xbox One and the PS4" They would have easily had a smaller backlash than this.

I hope they get buried in this.



Bet with Adamblaziken:

I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.

curl-6 on 07 October 2014
Normchacho said:
thismeintiel said:
Normchacho said:
Ubisofts response is just down right insulting. We know the power gap is there, we've seen it used in other games as recently as Shadow of Mordor where the PS4 version has a significant advantage. Both the specs and results show it.

Ubi is trying to convince us that somehow both the PS4 and Xbox One versions are 900p @30 fps without having to limit the PS4 version in any way. Utter garbage.

Yea, their excuses just come off exactly as they are, damage control.  They say the CPU is limiting them, because of AI.  Well, okay.  Then, does that mean that the AI is going to be the most spectacular AI ever seen?  Nope.  I doubt it'll be much different than the other ACs.  Now they are saying they optimized it to the max on both consoles, yet they are both 900p 30FPS.  So, does that mean that it will be the most beautiful game on the PS4?  Nope.  The vids I have seen do look really good, but I think Infamous:SS looks better, and its pulling off way more effects and runs ~40 FPS on average.  Does that also mean it will look quite a bit better than the One version?  Doubt it.  Maybe a little bit better AA, but for the most part, I bet they will look the same.


For me the performance isn't the issue, I could even handle parity. What gets me is the awful, awful way they've gone about presenting and then explaining it. Had they just come out and said "AC:U will be 900p @ 30 fps on both the Xbox One and the PS4" They would have easily had a smaller backlash than this.

I hope they get buried in this.

What's going to happen is a quick about face and a bump up to 1080p, either before release or shortly afterwards via a patch.



Zanten on 07 October 2014

Sorta saw this thread coming. xP I suspect I can see the future.



Zanten, Doer Of The Things

Unless He Forgets In Which Case Zanten, Forgetter Of The Things

Or He Procrascinates, In Which Case Zanten, Doer Of The Things Later

Or It Involves Moving Furniture, in Which Case Zanten, F*** You.

TheSting on 07 October 2014
Jaxyfoo said:
This is by far the worst thread you have ever made TB, and that poll is the worst I have seen to boot. This is not console warring, it is about time Ubisoft stopped playing us for fools. On xmas eve they promise us a million new toys and xmas day we open an empty box with a note saying maybe next year. 1080/60 - 900/30 on both is not a win for anybody.

Neither console owner should be buying this game. On top of the lies, the previews are all saying how buggy and awful the game is looking a month away from release. Let them delay it and make the best game they possibly can, and release it when it is really ready. Anybody buying this on Xbox one as an FU at PS4 owners are just making themselves look silly. Buy Forsa H2, Sunset Overdive and Halo for that. Leave this one where it belongs, in the dung heap.


Buying it as a FU to PS fans?? Lol.