A post count was requested at the end of Day One, here it is as of this post:

[Nicklesbe] => 105
[Wonktonodi] => 87
[impertinence] => 84
[TruckOSaurus] => 66
[Carl2291] => 61
[Conegamer] => 43
[WhiteEaglePL] => 41
[radishhead] => 36
[theprof00] => 36
[Wright] => 32
[Sparks] => 32
[HylianSwordsman] => 31 (2 as FusionCode)
[spurgeonryan] => 22
[AstroGamer] => 9
[padib] => 6
[bugrimmar] => 5

Apologies if I'm going mad, but where's EricFabian?

No. Those who played the FE Mafia game know how badly I don't want my character said.

jeez....it's only day 2 :O

So I've been looking into Sparks and it ain't looking good... at all!

First of all, he "saw a slip" in impertinence's post that said "Carl. You are claiming Terran, Protoss and Zerg, doesn't that leave a 66% chance your scum?" and confronted him on it in these posts [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6659023] , [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6659229], [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6659344] which seems to indicate he didn't know that the Town was indeed informed that Non-Terran = Scum.

Also, he was on Nickles all Day long, never going back and consider the possibility of him being Town. He started right after NIckels stupid gambit [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6658974]. Still mentionned Nickels when he was pressuring and voting for impertinence [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6659023], [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6659344]. 

While I wasn't happy with Nickels' strategy, I eventually got over my initial ressentment toward his play and got to the conclusion his "I'm a burden to Town" play didn't make sense to attempt as scum. Sparks, on the other hand, was relentless:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6667131 - Picks apart Nickels's case against Carl and uses that as motivation to vote for him.
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6665354 - Goes on a little speech about the value of a townie's life (which was parroting at that point btw) and tells Nickels to stop voting for himself but ends his post by saying that he's sure he's scum anyway.
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6665358 - Says the exchange with Carl feels fake. Now at this point Sparks is systematically putting everything Nickels does in a bad light. It looks like someone trying to find reasons for a player to be scum instead of someone trying to find out the truth.
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6670509 - As the Day ends and he didn't get his way he continues to cast suspicion on Nickels (to prepare for toDay I guess).

Also, Sparks was dismissive of the case against Astro, again trying to return everything to Nickels: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6670559

And a final little detail, Hylian voiced suspicions on Sparks [http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6669783] and now Hylian is dead.

If you have no role and your "power" is pretty much worthless, then what do you have to fear?

Unless your unit isnt Terran, of course.

So you're basically saying that you set me up to see who I would vote for? I'm not buying that for a moment. If you didn't want Nickles lynched, you wouldn't have taken the risk with voting him thus closing the gap and allowing one vote to change it even if you had your seperate tab open (which I am unsure about)

This seems to me like trying to worm your way out of a suspicious scenario by deflecting and not allowing people to examine your actions in detail right now. The whole thing is a very unusual move if your motives are as you claim.