Dodece said: European governments have a twisted sense of economic justice. These are the same governments that fund commercial enterprises to compete with privately owned commercial enterprises. Microsoft flaunted the last fine, and they will flaunt this fine, and why should they cede an economic advantage they earned. Windows isn't a god given gift to the world its the property of a corporation. Europe has a problem with that I suppose they can fund their own software company to develop a operating system.
You might gather I take issue with Europe's trading practices. Much of the rest of the world has similar issues. Excessive tariffs, standardization, unfair competition always favoring the local company over the one based in another country. So I put very little credence in what European's consider to be fair or unfair. When a free trade economy says the competition is unfair then I take greater interest. |
How exactly would a free trade economy say anything? As far as I know, economy has no official representative.
I'm probably not understanding your point, could you please explain?
PS: The reason MS should pay the fine is that they have to play by the rules of the markets they participate in. Are you aware that EU can confiscate MS's assets if they don't pay the fine? For example, retaining revenue from the sales of MS products in the EU, until the fine is paid.