Articles have to be approved on N4g?! Well, then it's even worse than I thought what's going on with this site. So many hate articles on there...

Honestly besides graphics, it doesnt really look like anything that's too interesting quite honestly.

However,it doesnt make the game ''bad'' either though.

http://whatifgaming.com/the-order-1886-is-incredibly-terrible-so-far

No don't post the link he fell for the clickbait, nothing good can come from this...

If you do threads (well, good threads that is) you should link the source for it.

I rate this article a 2, for the author's hard efforts at putting the game down, even though he probably hasn't played or even watched any footage of the game.

I wonder who all voted anything above a 5 for this article.

It's a bit strong worded but I kinda agree. Except for shiny pixels I haven't seen anything especially exciting about it. So either they're incredibly bad at picking good passages for demos or the whole game is full of boring corridor cover based shooting.

I gave it a 7. The review itself isn't that badly written. What makes it bad is judging about certain things that cannot possibly be judged by the little material we've seen so far. But that didn't go into my score.

Yeah! The sad part is that sometimes good, interesting articles don't even get approved!