By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - MS told Blizzard 900p was "unacceptable" for Diablo 3 on Xbox One.

Mr.Playstation on 19 August 2014
SvennoJ said:
Vincoletto said:
I wonder how many people would see the difference between a 900p and 1080p game on an 50 inch TV

I wonder how many people notice drops to 50fps. I didn't in KZ SF on a 92" screen.

92" screen. I have to imaginge that even 1080p games on that screen do not look good. It must have been a nightmare playing seventh gen consoles on that monster. 



Send a Friend Request On PSN :P

Around the Network
dangerguy on 19 August 2014
BenVTrigger said:
kinisking said:
That's cuz they weren't using the June update. Ms told them to use the June update so then they were able to achieve 1080p and according to videos it has a more stable framer ate than the ps4


No the PS4 version has a better frame rate. The double buffer glitch that was effecting the PS4 version was patched. The Xbox One version drop to low 50s while PS4 is a rock solid 60.

Not a big deal though both ports are great.

 

False, nowhere in that article does it state Ps4 is "rock solid" 60FPS.  They haven't even done the full comparison yet. 



AZWification on 19 August 2014

Meh... It's not like it would make such a huge difference with a game like Diablo III! :S



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

lightofhonor on 19 August 2014
shikamaru317 said:

Diablo 3 isn't a particularly impressive game graphically, 1080p shouldn't have been a problem. I can play games with similar graphics at 1080p on my PC which has less than half the specs of my Xbox One. If Blizzard actually had problems hitting 1080p on Xbox One, the engine they used for Diablo 3 must be pretty crappy.


On PC they do all their games in OpenGL to enable to them to be played on PC/Mac/Linux. XBO probably doesn't like that since MS pushes DX11.



dyremose on 19 August 2014
Tamron said:
Vincoletto said:
I wonder how many people would see the difference between a 900p and 1080p game on an 50 inch TV

quite a lot, on a 23" tv, not so much.

32" is where the difference starts to get noticeable on 72p to 1080p for a 900p outup i estimate it being around the 40" screen for you to see a noticeable difference.  50" absolutely everyone should be able to spot it otherwise you might need to go and you eyes examimed



Around the Network
DD_Bwest on 19 August 2014
dyremose said:

32" is where the difference starts to get noticeable on 72p to 1080p for a 900p outup i estimate it being around the 40" screen for you to see a noticeable difference.  50" absolutely everyone should be able to spot it otherwise you might need to go and you eyes examimed


viewing distance also plays a part.   luckily this has all been covered.



I am Torgo, I take care of the place while the master is away.

"Hes the clown that makes the dark side fun.. Torgo!"

Ha.. i won my bet, but i wasnt around to gloat because im on a better forum!  See ya guys on Viz

kitler53 on 19 August 2014

i agree,.. 900p is unacceptable.



Vincoletto on 19 August 2014
Mr.Playstation said:
SvennoJ said:
Vincoletto said:
I wonder how many people would see the difference between a 900p and 1080p game on an 50 inch TV

I wonder how many people notice drops to 50fps. I didn't in KZ SF on a 92" screen.

92" screen. I have to imaginge that even 1080p games on that screen do not look good. It must have been a nightmare playing seventh gen consoles on that monster. 


ANyway, how many people have a 92 inch screen? You cant base your business or creative or technical decisions based on the minotity of the minority or the minority of your consumers.

I believe most poeple play on 42-52 inch screens



Shikaidiot on 19 August 2014

Alt Removed - Mod Team



OttoniBastos on 19 August 2014

Design a hardware that has problems to reach 1080p/60fps without graphical downgrades...


...says that is unacceptable not reach 1080p/60fps for third party devs.