doubtful, but to imply ND does just pretty graphics is a horrible lie.

No matter how you look at it, DC looks like a proper AAA racer on the 8th gen. Forza simply cannot compete, at least in graphical terms.

Weather looks stunning on Driveclub, i hope its not too long post release till they patch it in.

DC looks ridiculously awesome graphically but I hope there is a good driving weight and feel. It doesn't have to be a sim but I hate when the driving feel has no trace of realism. I love Forza 1-3 and all GT.

There is something wierd with Forza color balance.

The cars are to bright and vivid but the environment is more dull.

That is what I think this "side by side" shows. Effects and light seems equal.

However Forza sense of speed looks more intence and the race more agrecive.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=188354&page=1

Both look great but it is a strange comparison since one displays rain without sun, and one displays rain with sunlight. I kind off prefer the dirtier, grittier style of Driveclub graphically, but FH2 beats it hands down thanks to its open, world style.

1 year more development time can do wonders

but its an unfair comparison

forza 5 = sim racer

diveclub = arcade racer

diffrent type of games.

driceclub is made to look good

forza 5 is made to drive good

The hell, is this a comparison between the ps4 version of driveclub and the 360 version of fh2, because the latter looks like dogshit, at least when next to the other.

If rain physics made things fun I would just drive while it's raining.

Anyway, I usually don't like pure racing games, which is why I'm unsure of Driveclub. I like the open world of games like NFS MW/Carbon. I'll try out Driveclub (getting part of it for free, so why not), but not sure if I'll actually buy it. Forza looks more interesting, but I'm also skeptical on what there'll be to do in the opne world. If it's just races, I'll pass. If it's like Burnout Paradise, I'm in.