How long until night?
theprof00 said: outlaw, I don't know if you just have a zen like control over your emotions or what, but you seem pretty resigned to giving up...like your heart is just not in this. I asked you earlier how many games you've played. I haven't received an answer. |
I do my best to keep my emotions in check, but this is the first time I've heard that sort of comment. I'll take it as a complement. As for my heart not being in it, I kinda feel meh because of the pace. It's not like we've only meaningless discussion, but the long timeline has kinda strecthed the butter too thin if the expression works there.
I've played about 10 or so mafia games in real life, and maybe 7 or 8 on VGC. This was all in the infancy of VGC mafia games though. So I have some experience, but not a great deal.
padib said:
Do you think his initial vote on prof was distancing? Do you think sparks is in that group? |
It's certainly possible, because he changed his tune real quick. It's still weird, because I wouldn't think someone so inactive would need to worry about distancing.
As for sparks, I don't think so. It's a possibility I'll keep in the back of my mind.
padib said:
Can you explain to me what about Wright's behavior deserved this vote? |
At the time, I read his post like he wanted to vote conegamer. In order to do so, he put out some nonsense in order to vote for him. I found it odd and did the whole FoS thing.
outlawauron said:
It's certainly possible, because he changed his tune real quick. It's still weird, because I wouldn't think someone so inactive would need to worry about distancing. As for sparks, I don't think so. It's a possibility I'll keep in the back of my mind. |
So....do you think wright is a mafia who was trying to accuse a townie?
Or I dunno, maybe wright is a townie who saw a certain reaction suspicious?
I have to say.....I agree with what Wright saw at the time. I think he was valid. Not saying wright is mafia or town. Just saying I agree with what I saw in Cone's reaction. Cone, don't bother responding to this please.
RCTjunkie said:
That said, I do acknowledge that your contributions are very active and make the game lively. I will unvote you, but you must know that it's not because you asked me to (in fact, if I went with my gut, I would be much more inclined to stick with my vote), but because I see your contributions and the benefit they give the game regardless of whatever side you're on. You are not on good terms with me. UNVOTE: theprof00 VOTE: outlawauron |
Found the post. So RCT, can you please explain why you switched your vote to me at prof's request? Because you gave literally no reason.
theprof00 said:
So....do you think wright is a mafia who was trying to accuse a townie? Or I dunno, maybe wright is a townie who saw a certain reaction suspicious? I have to say.....I agree with what Wright saw at the time. I think he was valid. Not saying wright is mafia or town. Just saying I agree with what I saw in Cone's reaction. Cone, don't bother responding to this please. |
If I thought wright was mafia trying to accuse a townie, then I would have voted for him. I do not know if that is the case, hence the FoS.
padib said: Prof if I don't get an answer to my question I will vote you immediately. |
I'm so scared.
What question? about wright? I don't know. He's another black hole. His only real analysis worthy input is the reaction to cone.
THe question is, did he see cone as a townie who could be lynchable, or as a mafia who was in a corner.
That question is very hard to answer.
padib said:
I don't see how any of those 3 links contain deflecting. |
It's because he doesn't defend himself, only redirecting attention elsewhere.
padib said:
I don't see how he must defend himself over every flimsy case. It's up to town to see through them. He's free to post about whatever he prefers. A good townie does not always need to defend himself. He should defend himself only when legitimate questions come up. |
So sayeth the lord.
Why are you taking such an interest in outlaw?