And since the ball is rolling, do folks still want me to continue in my post/contribution chart?
I can still do it, but it does take time.
And since the ball is rolling, do folks still want me to continue in my post/contribution chart?
I can still do it, but it does take time.
Smeags said: And since the ball is rolling, do folks still want me to continue in my post/contribution chart? I can still do it, but it does take time. |
It would be much appreciated, but if you don't have the time then don't worry about it. As you said we've sorta got a good picture of things now
Smeags said: And since the ball is rolling, do folks still want me to continue in my post/contribution chart? I can still do it, but it does take time. |
I enjoy it because it's new to me, although I do think people place quite a lot into it.
Cone:
A few joke posts to start, seems to be excited. Some joke accusations, a little evasiveness. Nothing too blatant. His first semi serious post is regarding smeags output chart, and apologizes for low input, but defends by saying he's new to the game and is trying to feel it out. Says he has work to do (in the thread). Wright thinks hes good for a lynch, and hylian seems to defend him a bit. Comes back to notice Wright's accusation. Apologizes again. After being asked to provide input he accuses Wright of not having any substance, and spurge for seemingly playing in a forced way. As Wright says, it does come off a bit as "jumpiness". He responds that he's just playing and won't let flimsy accusations stand against him. He Thinks wright is mafia and gives him an FoS.
Then I ask him about my accusations. He doesn't like Khans vote on me, and he doesn't agree with my vote on hylian, says Hylian is a bit worrisome, but also thinks much of it could be mistakes. Wants to know why spurge voted him. Not really sure what the reasons are. Defends his playstyle. Cone says he made a decision...let's see how it goes. After being voted by sparks wants to know the reason.
I think I've read enough.
Verdict: TOWN
I'll be going through everyone like this, or at least I'll try.
theprof00 said:
I'll be going through everyone like this, or at least I'll try. |
Be careful about doing so. If you get someone wrong the wrong way, people could suspect you're mafia...
RCTjunkie said:
|
In what way?
Do you think I'm right about cone?
theprof00 said:
In what way? Do you think I'm right about cone? |
If you label someone as town and we somehow found out the person was mafia, major suspicion could rise on you. (I know they're guesses, but it'll still come into question depending on past accuracy).
And labeling someone as mafia when they're town could do something similar.
I know they're guesses and I do commend on your desire to give everyone something to go off of, but this may backfire if done wrong.
Ikepor
Nothing page one. Intro
page 2
Shows up again after being suspected as having no participation. Falls for my trap about mafia talking during the day. But I later dismiss it as possible human mistake/lie.
Page 3
Says "silence is golden". Asked if a lord by smeags, town tell for smeags...looks like he just tried to trick ikepor too, but not sure if it was an impotent trick. I don't think mafia fakeclaims would be lords. Says what's not being said is the trail of breadcrumbs. Those who are active have something to hide. Is he saying he doesn't have anything to hide? Confusing as his next line is that those who don't talk much want to be looked over.
Page 4
Notes that khan has also been quiet. Appears he is keeping up at this point.
Not much else left.
VERDICT: Strong chance of town
He seems to be trying to hold back a bit. However, I'm going to reveal my trap that I mentioned earlier about the mafia daytalk. So, you know how I said I was just asking him to see if he was keeping up? Weellll, that was kind of a red herring. The REAL thing I was looking at was if he'd correct me....but for a different reason. I specifically told him that good townies pay attention when I mentioned the day talking. Specifically, if IkePoR was mafia, I would think that he would either want to correct me or question whether or not that was true. Being mafia, he would know for a certainty what the answer was...but he never even addresses it. My opinion is that he doesn't know the answer and wasn't keeping up, and didn't want to be arsed to go find out if what I was saying was true or not. To me, this hints that IkePoR is simply being lazy, which shows through in his posting quality and volume. There was another time when I asked him a question and he didn't answer me. I would simply assume he is not following along too much. Also, his comment about quiet people waiting in the shadows to strike rings too closely to his own posting frequency. As a mafia, I don't think he would want to paint himself in such a light.
RCTjunkie said:
If you label someone as town and we somehow found out the person was mafia, major suspicion could rise on you. (I know they're guesses, but it'll still come into question depending on past accuracy). And labeling someone as mafia when they're town could do something similar. I know they're guesses and I do commend on your desire to give everyone something to go off of, but this may backfire if done wrong. |
See this is why I like you for town. You didn't have to warn me about this, you could've just let it play out.
Anyway, to address you, yeah they're guesses...except cone. I'm 99% confident he's town. I just wrote one for Ike...I'd say 75% chance of being town.
Nicklesbe said: Hey all. Spent most of yesterday and night with a close friend. You all have been busy. Just putting this here to let you all know I am re-reading everything. Prof and Padib I will be responding to you and answering your questions as well as discuss some other things I have been seeing. So I'm here now and I'm not ignoring any of you ^.^ |
ooooohhh ;D