Sparks said: You're not the prime suspect. Not even close. Did you read what I said in the post? |
Problem is, he's too busy sweating to even notice.
Sparks said: You're not the prime suspect. Not even close. Did you read what I said in the post? |
Problem is, he's too busy sweating to even notice.
Woops, I had my maths wrong due to there being two entries for RCT
The correct entries are:
Ike | 36.36% |
Wright | 14.29% |
White | 41.67% |
RCT | 40.00% |
Cone | 19.05% |
Hylian | 50.00% |
Outlaw | -5.00% |
Noname | 75.00% |
Spurge | 68.89% |
Nickels | 42.53% |
Smeags | 47.37% |
Sparks | 15.27% |
Khan | 30.00% |
padib | 39.47% |
stdev= 21%
1st ST= 35.5-+21
RANGE=(14.5 to 56.5)
Ike
White
RCT
Cone
Hlian
Nickels
Smeags
Sparks
Khan
Padib
Using improvement only, we'll just look at the upside
RANGE 35.5 + 21
White
RCT
Hylian
Nickels
Smeags
Padib
Ike
Sparks
These players above have seen statistically significant improvement because of my presence. Basically, I gave the players above things to talk about and reasons to contribute whether it be attacking me or answering questions
Looking at the downside
RANGE 35.5 - 21
Cone
Khan
These players haven't improved as much as the average, due to my presence. Basically, these players haven't increased in quality along as much as the rest. My input made them less talkative. These are clams, due to my talking.
Total deviation:
Spurge
Noname
These players showed improvement with likely little affect from myself. Good sign.
Wright
Outlaw
These players showed very little improvement with likely little affect from myself. These are your clams, and they're clammed with or without me. As I said in the previous post, I didn't think I had any effect on wright, and the numbers support me on that idea.
Sparks said:
You're not the prime suspect. Not even close. Did you read what I said in the post? |
Yes, I saw what you said. Just because a couple of people have voted for me it doesn't mean it becomes a one-on-one, particularly on the first day. If there's other people who you believe are more suspicious, why not vote for them? Surely you have reasons to vote for them, right? Perhaps you could provide them.
There's no sweating here, Wright. Don't worry. It's just funny because I don't understand what I've done to cause such suspicion, really. Just feels like traditional Fire Emblem games; the healer gets isolated and then gets attacked because they're the most vulnerable rather than because they're the biggest threat.
Post vs contribution was tallied as
Post vs contributions before or unrelated to my topics
Post vs contributions after or related to my topics.
Also I'm not posting because of you, or anyone else, theprof. Quite simply I have a major family event coming up in a few days and have been incredibly busy with other stuff as well. Some people know what these things are, but I'd rather not go into them here. Rest assured that, with the time to respond in more depth and be here to accuse and defend more then I would. It's just not going to be feasible until Tuesday where I'll have more time.
Perhaps that makes me look "suspicious", but similarly other users have posted far less and completely dodge questions which are asked from them, rather than responding and answering the questions where needed as I am.
Cone it's really important that you don't make posts that negligently distort my findings, lest some moron comes in and starts repeating what you're saying.
The graph is not about post count, and I didn't say you are posting content.
In fact, the number show that you HAVE improved over the course of the game, just that your rate of quality has not improved as much as others.
Please be aware of what numbers mean before you go labeling them for others.
I spent a lot of time on that research so please respect me enough to not make mockery of something you don't understand.
For the record I don't think you should be lynched.
I think Outlaw should.
theprof00 said: Cone it's really important that you don't make posts that negligently distort my findings, lest some moron comes in and starts repeating what you're saying. The graph is not about post count, and I didn't say you are posting content. In fact, the number show that you HAVE improved over the course of the game, just that your rate of quality has not improved as much as others. Please be aware of what numbers mean before you go labeling them for others. |
My apologies, that was not my intention. I was just making a point in general as opposed to with regards to your charts and your system. Your research is incredibly useful and appreciated, and I didn't mean to insult it or what have you. Infact it merely validates further my opinion, so thanks for the work you put into it!
Also
@MR KHAN
I asked you a to back up your case against me and you have yet to respond.
I asked you to provide evidence in posts of my divisiveness and strife causing.
Please resopnd to a simple request to provide evidence.
Also
unvote Hylian
Vote Outlaw