By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Fire Emblem Mafia - Game Thread - Concluded

outlawauron said:
theprof00 said:
Ill answer ypur question with another question.
outlaw, what have you discovered so far about sparks?

I discovered links to a true identity!

Seriously, I just figured what his old account was.

Great. Anything useful to this game? :D



Around the Network
theprof00 said:

Great. Anything useful to this game? :D


What's up with the metaplayerism. Get your shit together, prof.



Person Voting To Lynch Identity

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5  
Conegamer            
HylianSwordsman            
IkePoR            
Mr. Khan theprof00          
Nicklesbe            
noname2200            
outlawauron            
padib            
RCTjunkie theprof00          
Smeags            
Sparks            
spurgeonryan            
theprof00 HylianSwordsman          
WhiteEaglePL            
Wright Conegamer          
  With 15 alive, it takes 8 to lynch.  


Mr Khan said:
theprof00 said:
Mr Khan said:
Vote: Prof00

He may claim heroism, but his debate tactics seem scummy to me. Are you Izuka?

Not sure why my character matters....but I'm Nolan.

And, while I appreciate your input, can you explain a little more your feelings on my debating?

Sowing division and strife everywhere you wander. It's very unseemly.

Division? Strife? Do you have examples?

Let me remind you that

division means:"causing disagreement: causing disagreement or hostility within a group so that it is likely to split"

And Strife:"bitter conflict or rivalry: bitter and sometimes violent conflict, struggle, or rivalry"

I would like to see your evidence because all you're doing is repeating what Hylian said, who himself cannot back up his accusations.



Wright said:
Conegamer said:

Wright - He accused me of being suspicious, and yet had nothing to back that up with. Similarly some other posts of his have been short, accusational posts with little to no reasoning behind it other than as a "hit and run". What is the point of this I wonder? Why try to throw someone into the fire without any basis, other than to try and draw attention off of you and (hopefully) attract the masses to the user you're accusing as opposed to yourself? It doesn't make a lot of sense unless he's doing exactly that; drawing attention away from himself.


 

You speak like a cornered man. In fact, you admit I had nothing but mere words when I accused you back there; yet you felt the necessity of directing suspicious toward me when it would have been way more easy to just say "Don't listen to this fool, he has nothing but hate towards me" or something like that. Heck, you of all people should know that what I said has no substance in a court, especially not without proof or a proper explanation; but your nerves betrayed you.

 

I can see you're sweating.

 

I vote Conegamer.

I speak like a cornered man? All I was doing was providing a rebuttal after you accused me for no reason. I'm not going to be insulting or rush to a judgement on you as you seem to be with me. I'm not going to stand back as you accuse me of falsehoods, Wright. However, your swift decision to condemn me seems suspicious enough. 

FoS Wright



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

Around the Network

Heh, ConeGamer reminds me of my first game. Testing the waters and using positivity to try and build bridges (Folks playing Mafia aren't very friendly).

Of course, I was Catherine the Mafia Whore that game. Not sure if I would have played any differently that first day even if I was a townie, but... you never know.



padib said:


I'm interested to know how noname feels about his request to prof not being properly answered. (http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6559394)


It was about what I expected to happen.



padib said:
So far severe townie tell on Wright.

He is playing to find scum tells and I like it! You would have been lots of fun in a pheonix wright flavored game I'm thinking :D


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSyYps8xJfs

 

Spoilers obviously.



padib said:

Which is basically a no answer, right? :P

Correct. For now his approach has raised enough interesting reactions that I'm content to let him continue largely unmolested and see what else gets flushed out. But the two points I raised were ones I couldn't follow much at all.



You folks get so worked up over such little things. Next time you feel all riled up, take a second and think of your best friend. Always cheers me up.



"You should be banned. Youre clearly flaming the president and even his brother who you know nothing about. Dont be such a partisan hack"