By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Fire Emblem Mafia - Game Thread - Concluded

Conegamer said:

Yeah. I'm not too keen on the idea of lynching the town doctor just to "narrow down the suspects". That can be done with evidence, can it not? 

Right now, I'm wiilling to trust RCT and his claim. I'm not sold on his story completely but I do believe there's bigger suspects out there. Wright and Khan, primarily. Wright for the reasons upon which I've already discussed (evasion, lack of a contribution, holding information back to the benefit of noone for a very weak reason indeed), and Khan due to his posting style and his voting for TheProf just now. It strikes of a retaliation move, which he admitted, moreso than anything else. In addition he doesn't seem to be contributing that much, aside from to jump in with the occasional comment. 

As for Sparks, I can't decide. I'd say Nickelsbe and TheProf are definitely town. Sparks has made some curious moves and actions but he's provided some reasoning for them, and indeed has posted some good possibilities. To answer his questions as well which he just posed:

1. Yeah, pretty sure padib is town. I wouldn't have protected him if I didn't think so, even if upon reflection I should have gone with my gut and protected theprof. Actually that's a good question; were I to protect theprof, would Spurge still be alive? If so then I feel really bad about it

2. I'm not sold on Outlaw either way; he also hasn't contributed much on this, the second day. I'd like to hear more from him.

3. If I had to choose four for scum, then I would also agree with Khan, Trucks, with Wright and either Outlaw, RCT, Sparks or Smears being the other. Can't decide right now but the first three I would be happy lynching. The latter three, I'm not so sure.

4. You make some good points. I apologize for the lack of participation as well. Might as well say that I was at my sister's wedding earlier this week and have been re-organizing the house after last week. Come next week I should be here more.

 

Hope that has at least helped people out a tad. Will comment more later, but food is about to arrive.


Surely you're done eating now? Why do you think Trucks is suspicious? Sparks has said his bit on it, but I'd like to hear yours. All I really had on him yesterday was that he seemed to buddy up with prof, but that was back when I suspected prof a lot more, so maybe I was imagining that. Right now, I'm surprised to see three different people eying him up, as Sparks and prof have also pointed fingers. So I want to hear your opinion on this. Also, why Outlaw? We've got a decently solid case for him being town, do you disagree with it? And why Smeags? I'll admit, he just hasn't been around enough or contributing enough for me to feel totally safe with him, but he's been helpful, moreso than most of your other suspects. So why?



Around the Network
theprof00 said:
Once again, what is the reason your gut feeling was set off? I have my own reasons, and I agree, but I have posts to back up my feelings (which I haven't shared yet) what are yours?

After getting distracted and reading a whole bunch of my suspects' posts again, I'm more lost than ever, and I got a headache, ffs.

Anyways, I got my post ready in another tab, but then I thought I wanna see yours as well. I wanna post them at the same time. Are you there? I'll be here maybe for another half hour. If not, we can do it tomorrow.



I told you he wanted me dead, Nickles.



padib said:

theprof00 said:

except padib has lost a lot of that influence after me being protected.

I know it, he knows it.

What kind of posts would you say got you into trouble in the first place?

No, I lost a lot of that influence when I bowed to the democratic choice (testing my theory) instead of voting for the scummiest player.

Well guess what, I'm ready to reverse that trend.

*snip*

What happened yesterday I'm not ready to forget.

Next is cone.

You get angered too easily. Such drama.

You know I was about to post something regarding you "good doctor" theory about Cone but decided not for fear of making you flip out. Prof may be aggressive at times, but he's also reasonable.

Anyway, I'll go ahead since you already went ahead and flipped already. Yeah, Cone's a total noob. How can you expect him to think like you described. Also, I know where he might have gotten the idea to protect you. I stumbled upon while re-reading some stuff.

The only reason I post this, is juuust in case you happen to be one of the only people left in the game. Get yourself a better reason for suspecting Cone.



Ugh. Weekends just aren't fun for me. Double shift after double shift. @_@

@Prof

Congratulations on your purchase. I'll need to add you as a 3DS buddy.



Around the Network
padib said:
Sparks said:
padib said:

theprof00 said:

except padib has lost a lot of that influence after me being protected.

I know it, he knows it.

What kind of posts would you say got you into trouble in the first place?

No, I lost a lot of that influence when I bowed to the democratic choice (testing my theory) instead of voting for the scummiest player.

Well guess what, I'm ready to reverse that trend.

*snip*

What happened yesterday I'm not ready to forget.

Next is cone.

You get angered too easily. Such drama.

You know I was about to post something regarding you "good doctor" theory about Cone but decided not for fear of making you flip out. Prof may be aggressive at times, but he's also reasonable.

Anyway, I'll go ahead since you already went ahead and flipped already. Yeah, Cone's a total noob. How can you expect him to think like you described. Also, I know where he might have gotten the idea to protect you. I stumbled upon while re-reading some stuff.

The only reason I post this, is juuust in case you happen to be one of the only people left in the game. Get yourself a better reason for suspecting Cone.

Sparks, it's either Cone wasn't following the multiple "TOWN HAS ONLY POWER ROLE" and "I'm basically a vanilla townie after this" type posts, or his fake skill target is backfiring.

Sparks said:
I just realized I'm not the only one to change his style Day2. Prof's nice to everybody now, encouraging people, saying sorry to padib, no cussing, shouting, less aggressive in general. Am I to assume this is because of your scum buddies?

I actually very much agree with you on this.

I also very much dislike prof's vanilla claim, and I think he played really badly on day 1. He still has to explain his early vote on outlaw and keeping his vote there even after the interrogation I had with outlaw (similar to your vote placement).

You're the only person with that opinion. I think that means you're wrong or something



padib said:
theprof00 said:

You're the only person with that opinion. I think that means you're wrong or something

I'm just keepin' it real.

Then again, didn't I quote Sparks agreeing with him, I'm not sure how that makes me the only person.


I was talking about this part "and I think he played really badly on day 1"

:D



padib said:

I like your answer but I'm not convinced. I wasn't fishing for reaction with my Sparks vote though. He played very scummy on day 1, and was putting into doubt absolutely everything I did or said. It was completely counter-productive and wasn't reasonable.

My feeling was that only a desperate scum would play that way, but I'm still not sure what he was so worried about, was it the votes on RCT? Then, was it the votes on him?

I'm still not sure. And that's why I'm still skeptical of you. Sparks played really scumily on the end of day 1, so your unvote and reason at the time seemed flip-floppy.

That's not what it looked like to me. Granted it was a very stressful time and it was late here. It looked like Sparks was pushing your buttons pretty hard at the time and you just decided to fuck with him, I spent most of the day focusing on theprof and RCT, so at the time I may have missed some things with sparks. I couldn't help but think to myself "No fucking way. No way is he serious. Padib has been thoughtful and concise all game why would he spring this now unless he had an ulterior motive? Seems like a mafia move and that doesn't fit" Then I figured it would get a lot of great reactions which must have been the point. So I played along. We still had some time left so I figured I would let it stew for a little bit and left to shower and make a sandwhich and decided when I got back I would come clean and apologize, and if you were serious then there might have been enough time for you to make one last case against him and convince me for real. I already trusted you and it was a stressful time so it likely wouldn't have taken much. However when I got back me and Hylian were the only ones that still had a vote on him. You had changed your vote back to outlaw so it confirmed to me what I had originally thought. So I replied to Sparks one last time to get one more reaction out of him, to see if he would fight or fold, and then I came clean to get his final reaction to that. Considering what it's led to so far day 2 I'd say it was a success.

What I want to know is if you were serious why did you change your vote? When I saw that, it confirmed what I first thought. Apparently tho that observation was a mistake, one of many far that I will try to learn from. I'm sorry you lost trust in me, I have no one to blame for that but myself. I will just have to work that much harder to gain it back. What matters now is that we get the mafia and so far since day 2 started as well as what happend day 1 it's clear the most suspicious person has been Sparks. Prof made some good points earlier and as I said before if you wanted to make a serious case against sparks I would consider it. From theprofs findings and what you've said so far I am willing to support your vote and back your play again. This is my vote in stone. It will not change.

Vote; Sparks



http://www.youtube.com/v/AoOOpLpcF28 http://www.youtube.com/v/CphFZGH5030

All Hail the Jester King. The King is back, and I am still a dirty girl prof ;)

padib said:

Which makes me wonder. If RCT was town, what would motivate him to announce to mafia that he lost his bpv???


A mistake on his part, if he is town, but then you announced that you were reduced to vanilla, so I guess we all make mistakes. But then, you did try to get people to not nullify your power, and revealing what you did was necessary for there to even be a chance for town to decide not to nullify your power, so I don't see your situation as a big deal, whereas RCT's reveal seems like a mistake that doesn't help him much as town, but would increase the chance of getting protection by unsuspecting town if he were mafia. On the other hand, we were discussing the possibility of multiple factions, and evidence like a bulletproof vest being lost/destroyed when there was also a kill that happened was HUGE. Unfortunately, a few other possibilities crept in that prevented us from getting a confirmation on that. I'm kind of in the middle with my suspicions on RCT right now, but one thing's for sure, if he flipped to reveal that he had a bulletproof vest, it would just about confirm that there's either another killing party, or a thief. Everything I could come up with to explain RCT's missing vest, assuming he's telling the truth, involves either a theif or some other killing party. The flip would remove the lying variable. If it turned out he was lying, he's probably mafia, and if he's not, then he brought the lynch on himself and town is better off without him. So if he's lying, it's a good lynch, and if he's not lying, it's still a lynch that gets us some valuable information. I'm just not sure if it's worth the risk of losing the town. Let's say he's not lying. Is he more likely mafia or town? If there's a better than random chance that he's mafia if he's telling the truth, I would say he's the best lynch candidate we have. If not, then there are better lynches.



Person Voting To Lynch Identity

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5  
Conegamer RCTjunkie Wright        
HylianSwordsman ---          
Mr Khan Conegamer theprof00        
Nicklesbe outlawauron Sparks        
noname2200 outlawauron          
outlawauron Smeags          
padib outlawauron theprof00        
RCTjunkie ---          
Smeags outlawauron          
Sparks outlawauron TruckOSaurus        
theprof00 outlawauron Mr Khan        
TruckOSaurus outlawauron          
WhiteEaglePL ---          
Wright Conegamer          
spurgeonryan Conegamer --- --- --- --- Dozla
  With 14 alive, it takes 8 to lynch.  

If the vote count is in error, please PM me!

Countdown to Night 2: http://itsalmo.st/#night2