padib said:
Sparks said:
padib said:
theprof00 said:
except padib has lost a lot of that influence after me being protected.
I know it, he knows it.
What kind of posts would you say got you into trouble in the first place?
|
No, I lost a lot of that influence when I bowed to the democratic choice (testing my theory) instead of voting for the scummiest player.
Well guess what, I'm ready to reverse that trend.
*snip*
What happened yesterday I'm not ready to forget.
Next is cone.
|
You get angered too easily. Such drama.
You know I was about to post something regarding you "good doctor" theory about Cone but decided not for fear of making you flip out. Prof may be aggressive at times, but he's also reasonable.
Anyway, I'll go ahead since you already went ahead and flipped already. Yeah, Cone's a total noob. How can you expect him to think like you described. Also, I know where he might have gotten the idea to protect you. I stumbled upon while re-reading some stuff.
The only reason I post this, is juuust in case you happen to be one of the only people left in the game. Get yourself a better reason for suspecting Cone.
|
Sparks, it's either Cone wasn't following the multiple "TOWN HAS ONLY POWER ROLE" and "I'm basically a vanilla townie after this" type posts, or his fake skill target is backfiring.
Sparks said: I just realized I'm not the only one to change his style Day2. Prof's nice to everybody now, encouraging people, saying sorry to padib, no cussing, shouting, less aggressive in general. Am I to assume this is because of your scum buddies? |
I actually very much agree with you on this.
I also very much dislike prof's vanilla claim, and I think he played really badly on day 1. He still has to explain his early vote on outlaw and keeping his vote there even after the interrogation I had with outlaw (similar to your vote placement).
|
You're the only person with that opinion. I think that means you're wrong or something