Well don't call EVERYONE mafia (at least a lot of people). They might turn against you and get enough votes to lynch you....

You have enough suspects for two teams there. Who do you think is on which faction, if you had to guess, and why? I had my theories, but I no longer have enough suspects for two teams, and at this point after all that's happened, am not sure about either team's members. I still think a multi-faction game is a possibility. Of your quiet suspects, I've found Wright to be the most frustratingly quiet and dodgy, but to be fair, he's asked for a specific question and your parenthetical bit is the closest we've gotten to that.

I'd like to hear your thoughts on last night's murder and apparent attempted murder. Spurge was killed, prof claims to have been the intended target, RCT claims to have been a second intended target. What's your interpretation of all this?

Am I allowed to say who I targeted? Want to be extra careful after the faux-pas yesterday.

Thoughts, impressions, observations. You can start by telling us where you stand on RCT? What do you think on Cone's roleclaim in light of the information we already know?

And most of all, I'd like you to explain what you meant with this post: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6586082

No restriction whatsoever on mentionning who you targeted. The things that need to be paraphrased are you role card and any messages received from WoW.

Alright, that's what I thought (couldn't see any rules against it) but decided it's best to check.

Anyway I protected padib. He had admitted what his role, which worked, was which pretty much guaranteed he was town and as we couldn't be sure how many factions there were, what powers people had etc. I thought he could be a target. Hence I protected him.

I don't feel an evil vibe from RCT, but I am not so sure he was the intended target yesterday. I don't have proof to back it up, though.

And that post is evidence. I can't explain you what it is now, because I'm waiting to see what Khan does. Depending on the outcome, he can be a trustworthy townie or the serial killer.

Eh, I already posted in grief about Spurge's outcome.

I don't think RTC is a bad guy, but I doubt he was the intended target yesterday.

Hmm there goes that theory.
sorry guys that ive been a little pushy in the last page or so. I had an overarching theory and have been questioning all the little puzzle pieces and they were all falling in together.
from the multiple vests
to the thief
to the interactions
to the impossible protection setup

Basically, my theory was that when rct claimed bulletproof yesterday, he was actually referring to another protective source, say, a doctor.
then today he loses it and sparks says its odd for mafia to target him instead of maybe a different vest target. My assumption this far was that sparks and rct schemes during the night to work out this bulletproof claim. Rct would claim to have lost the protection, leaving the opportunity to someone having stolen it. Rct confirms that he was never informed of being attacked. The stone being stolen was one of the only three discussions sparks took part in yesterday, and if you read the day under the assumption that sparks took it, his posts actually start making sense.
this wpuld give rct town cred as he was possibly attacked by a mafia, and give sparks a fake role to claim..

But then the whole problem came in about overprotected town with an unsolvable combo of doc bodyguard and then vest too. Plus, the thief theory was a little complicated. Instead, if cone is actually a mafia doctor, and so was sparks and rct, cone could have protected rct last night, and had the ability to make ot look like spark had a vest as well. This would explain things a lot better and was a lot simpler.

The only problem is why wpuld mafia have a doc. The two answers are vigilante or serial killer or both. However we only have one confirmed attack last night. The answer wpuld have to be that a serial killer or vig targeted rct while he was protected.

But now that we know cone protected padib, that part kin of falls apart.