Read the day again under the assumption that sparks took it.

Out of those choices? We have a bodyguard so the odds of having both of the other two is highly unlikely. Thus, as I'm unsure what a Doctor is and as others have pointed out contradictions I will say the Bulletproof Vest seems the least likely.

A doctor is a healer

@Cone
look up doctor on mafiascum wiki and respond again asap

All excellent points. Let me try to bring in some clarity:

1. My zero hope came because I saw the tides turning against me quickly and I didn't think so many people would "unvote" me. I came back after a half day or so and suddenly saw seemingly everyone against me. It was before everyone started to decide to test the theory about protection for outlaw. I don't think anyone anticipated the voting frenzy that happened at the 11th hour, and especially me. That's why I gave up and told everyone my role so they could at least know I was telling the truth once I was lynched. I didn't fight because I didn't respond properly to the initial accusations and everyone took my silence as means of guilt. I had zero idea on how to defend myself in that short time, so I simply gave up.

2. I decided the "upperhand" thing when I got note that my beaststone was missing this morning. When I saw the note, I had thought at the time that someone tried to attack me and knew I was vulnerable, so I decided to tell everyone right away before the person that tried to kill me would try to turn everyone against me. It ended up being a bad idea as later theprof00 pointed out that the fact that it was missing indicates someone took it instead of it being used, wich would correlate with me admitting my role last night. Now someone has my stone and I'm guessing is attempting to get me lynched.

3. I don't necessarily question that theprof00 is lying about being protected, I'm just kind of upset that it's never gone into as extensive questioning as my testimony. I also want to say that being protected doesn't mean that spurge knew that theprof00 is town, or that he even is 100% town. I know Spurge protected someone, but I was curious if someone quiet had actually been protected and wanted to see if someone would call theprof00 out. From no accuations, I now believe theprof00.

In regards to WoW's error, maybe we can look into his Fire Emblem collection and see how extensive his knowledge is. It kind of sucks for him, because admitting a mistake brings out bias and "divine intervention" that would make the game unfair, but keeping silent puts unnessecary "evidence" against me that shouldn't exist in the first place. Personally, I think it's kind of a fun extra layer, abit frustrating at the same time. I don't blame WoW.

This is what I could do for my luch break. I'll be back in 4-5 hours to answer any follow-up questions. :)

I have a hard time believing you couldn't piece together what a Doctor is, Cleric.

I also like RCT at the moment, but i have lingering doubts about Cone too. Like i said, i need a few days before these thoughts stabilize.

If you're going to vote for Cone, remember to do it twice.

I know youre sore, but come back and play. I promise i wont rub it in your nose too much.

Thanks for answering RCT. I'm not convinced in either direction, I hope others will have more input on this. I don't want to rush a decision in either direction and I do appreciate your input.

1. If you are also a townie and want to help town please don't give up. Lies will unravel and the truth always shines through. At this point I am confused. TheProf, Sparks, Trucks, Padib, Smeags, and anyone else, can ya help me to understand this? Are you saying that you gave up, and took your vote off outlaw condemning yourself, and then immediately revealed your role? That doesn't seem like it was the way things went down. The chain of events seems off. From what I remember there was a time when you had the votes on you but sparks and theprof were saying we should vote for outlaw. Then you took your vote off outlaw condemning yourself, a bold move that made me think hard about a vote on outlaw instead. Then Padib used his power to save outlaw and a discussion started for testing padib's claim. Then others including myself moved our votes to outlaw, at this point you were very safe and then you revealed your role. Am I mistaken at all everyone? Input would be greatly appreciated.

2. So let me get this straight. You read the note and and decided, unprovoked to immediately make a post telling us you were attacked? No one else had any influence on that decision, and you told us right away? Are you sure that's how it happened? If so can you explain this?  From the looks of it you kept the info to yourself until sparks mentioned the possibility that someone attacked a player and we wouldn't necessarily know. That's when you said that you had been attacked.

3. Why be upset about it? Why not go into that line of questioning yourself? What's stopping you? If you think it's fishy then you need to question it. It doesn't do us any good being quiet about it and not pursuing it. As I said before until someone gives me reason to think they were the one that was protected instead I;m not sure what else I can ask. Do you have any questions I could ask? If so please share. For the sake of it tho TheProf00 can please answer this question: Did you lie about being protected? Can you give us reason to believe you were protected? Care to summerize the note that WoW sent you letting you know you were protected?

Also RCT you never answered my questions why you didn't put your vote back on Outlaw and why you kept your vote open. However I know you said you were on lunch so maybe you were just rushed. Would apprecaite more input from you. Also from everyone input would be great because I don't want to be making any mistakes so any and all input and corrections would be appreciated.