Fair enough, but I don't think we can completely fall on the side of inattention as its defense. It was a curious (lack of a) move, and should be noted as one.

@Khan

Oh, but you are alone! Who knows what you've spoken to the darkness? In bitter watches of the night, when all your life seems to shrink, the walls of your bower closing in about you, like a hutch to trammel some wild thing in! *puts hand on Khan's cheek* So fair, so cold, like a morning of pale spring still clinging to winter's chill...

Since you're here, explain.

u wot m8?

Also @Sparks I didn't recognize the slip at first but when it was discussed latter I kinda put two n two together, tho I have no idea what he can do. It wasn't exactly obvious, a least not as obvious as RCT's bullet proof vest blurt.

@padib cult raising army?.....

1. That doesn't need confirmation. It's pretty clear that mafia A wouldn't know which players are on mafia B. Otherwise it would be a pretty short game.

2. If RCT is mafia B, the only reason to try and kill him (as mafia A) would be to score townie points by claiming vigilante. However, there are also plenty of townie points to be had simply by pushing for a lynch on a player who at the end of yesterday was already being considered a prime contender for lynch today.

3. There is a hint of a cult being defeated and removed. That role you just made up is nonsense. Please stick to simpler ideas.

Not to get off topic but is it strange that I read smeag's message to Khan I read it in Bane's voice from the latest batman movie? Back on topic..seriously is that raising an army thing a real thing? Also any others that gave off they were magic users? Or is Cone the only one so far that we suspect due to the cleric blurt earlier?

1. Not traditionally. Bulletproof, as the name implies, protects someone from a mafia shot, or sometimes a vigilante's shot. It's doesn't protect from lynching (few things do).

2. It happens a lot when people are about to die. Doesn't mean it's true.

3. I have no idea.

4. Actually, claiming bulletproof would probably make you less of a target, hence the confusion (where is rct, by the way?)

5. He's not an easy target. He's (probably) a vanilla townie now = less likely to be targeted, actually. Why waste a kill on a vanilla, when you got the chance to kill a power role.

Sorry for the late reply. I wanted to hear others' thoughts before I gave you mine.

haha

Yes, there have been cults before...and everyone hates them. However, they are not a real threat in this game, just a figment of padib's bizarre imagination. Focus on the simple until the simple doesn't make sense anymore, not the other way around.

Sure.

At the time of my vote for OutlawAuron (4), RCTJunkie (5) was in the lead to be lynched, with Cone third in voting (3). Nicklesbe and NoName then switched their votes from RCT to Outlaw (Outlaw 6, RCT 3, Cone 3). This in effect put Outlaw in the lead, but now Cone and RCT were tied for second.

Then Padib changed his vote from RCT to Sparks (Outlaw 6, Cone 3, RCT 2, Sparks 1), putting Cone in second for a lynch. Knowing what we know about ConeGamer and a potential cascade lynch (as all we have is Padib's word), Prof pleaded for people to put RCT back in second. He unvoted RCT and voted for Outlaw without bolding. (Outlaw 5, Cone 3, RCT 3, Sparks 1)***

Hylian instead changes his vote from RCT to Sparks (Outlaw 5, Cone 3, Sparks 2, RCT 2). Prof once again fears for Cone. Twice even.

***At this point I did not see Prof's vote, and based off the vote totals I thought were in effect (Outlaw 6, Cone 3, Sparks 2, RCT 1) I made the call to change my vote from Outlaw to Sparks (Oulaw 5, Cone 3, Sparks 3, RCT 1) to ensure a tie with ConeGamer. In case of a cascading lynch, there would be no lynch due to a tie. I even asked if that constituted as a safety net for Cone. Again I asked if that would be enough for Cone's protection (no one ever answered me during the ensuing chaos).

Either way, whether it was a tie with you or a tie with RCT, Cone would have survived in case of an unforseen cascading lynch. That's why I voted for you.

To expound on 2 again:

Why would a team waste a kill on a player with a vest when instead they could just kill one of you five who pushed for rct's lynch, and then push? IE: mafia kills padib and then in the morning says "vote: rct. I have every indication that rct is mafia and that padib was picked because of his leadership against the suspect".

That would score massive town points and remove another player from the pool. The less players are killed, the longer the game goes, the more likely mafia lose.

i quoted Grima Wormtongue earlier, and Khan thought I looked sinster for it. So I finished the scene.