Your honest opinion is hardly new or original.
My honest opinion is that you are wrong.
Your honest opinion is hardly new or original.
My honest opinion is that you are wrong.
Intrinsic said:
I am not sure I am following you. I think you agree with what I am saying about half assing PCs since you lose the benefits of PCs and don't have the benefits of consoles. But you also seem to be suggesting that an alternative would be a steam console that has the GPU power of two titans in SLI? Or are you referring to a "stream" box like say PSnow but with the GPU power of SLI titans.... Either way, both scenarios won't work.
|
I agree with you. Maybe my post had too many mistakes.
Steam "console" is dumb, altough a 1k rig with cutting edge power could see some sucess with people that want graphics and little hassle, but that wouldn't scratch console. And all the disavantages I agree and have listed.
Stream console I put as an alternative because a powerfull, plug and play, cheap box could work (a la psnow). The gain in scale could help reduce cost, but we are probably 10+ years to early for it in our bad net.
All in all ps is the best place to play and isn't dying. This is a thread of a Nintendo fan justifying Nintendo fail with the death of console model.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
Well... I think that high end pc gaming will have a hard time in the future.
Reason 1: due to a lot of people playing on "lower end" gaming devices such as smartphones, it would not be very reasonable when devs would focus on making games that would only run on high end pc's. everything will merge towards an average and that average will certainly not be a high end gaming pc.
Reason 2: streaming. Why building high end pc's when future games will run on servers anyway?
But the PS4 and XBO are doing better then the PS360, so...
Edit: Also a lot of PS360 gamers still need to jump over to the PS4XB0.
Then why is ps4 selling 8 million in half a year without any games?
PullusPardus said: consoles have become pointless, since they're using the same architecture as a pc, and they're basically all about software updates and downloads nowadays, I don't see what's the point of them anymore, they Have become a poor man's pc, You can argue they're cheaper but so are PCS, you can get a better pc for the same price and upgrade it from there, and that will last you till your motherboard explodes (forever), you get cheaper games, more functionality, more room for tweaking and more ways to play, also free online and unrestricted services. Look I'm not saying this as a pc gamer I'm saying this as a fellow gamer, handhelds have buttons over phones, consoles have nothing over PCS so what's the point of them nowadays? In the old days it made a lot more sense, consoles were meant to be "plug in and play" experience as in you buy a game from the store and you stick it on the console and play, now you buy it off the store and install it, and then download the patch and hope everything works fine, what difference is there from a PC? I would love to hear what you think the difference is.
Now developers are always talking about graphics and how much 1080p 60 fps their game is, it's like you bought a console so you can argue about specs on the Internet instead of playing it, and then comes ps5 with PS4 games with updated graphics "how it's meant to be played" crap by developers, and the sad thing people always get sucked into that pr bullshit, I could argue for a long time but tell me, whats so different about a PS4 and a PC? |
Lol. No offense. If you are saying as a gamer then kudos. But I have seen a lot of PC only gamers who always bad mouth consoles, brings powerful rig as defense. But in reality many of those friends are really jealous of consoles; especially exclusives.
Average joe dont care about 1080p 60fps. If they cared then we could see all multiplats selling 90% in PS4 and 10% in Xbox One. People want to play in a system that is plug and play. PS3 was weaker than Xbox 360. But didnt that mean all multiplats sold 80% in Xbox 360. Nope. It didnt.
And if I cant play these great games in PC which has 1080P 60 fps, 4k, 8k resolution then why play only in PC. I would rather play in 720p these games rather unable to play these. Consoles are always special.
marioboy2004 said: Then why is ps4 selling 8 million in half a year without any games? |
Shhh. Dont say these number loudly. It will make anti console guys upset.
Rafux said:
Yea about when they are 70% off on Steam, sales on consoles are bigger just look at Minecraft and how some games are released later to avoid piracy. |
Pretty generalised statement there.Console sales are bigger.So Diablo 3 sold more on PS3 than PC? Individually mine raft sold the most on PC but yes, if you add up all console platform sales yes together they are more.
daredevil.shark said:
|
I dont think consoles are dying at all, but Im still baffled about the PS4 sales. I guess hype is stronger than actual games...