Wright said:
SlayerRondo said:
Wright said:
alabtrosMyster said:
Well that's awkward :-S why exempt anything?
|
Maybe because as Khan pointed out, the bussiness is too profitable for Japan to close it.
|
I think they exempted it because with fake images their is no child at the other end being exploited in ways to which they can't possibly give consent.
|
But I doubt real-life child pornography grants Japan as much money as videogames, mangas and anime depicting it. Remember, just a few weeks ago, owning real-life child pornography in Japan was legal. There's no reason not to exempt something just because it isn't real.
|
"There's no reason not to exempt something just because it isn't real." Is that a joke? If you shoot someone in real life you go to jail, if you shoot someone in a video game you don't, real amd not real do male a difference.
But their is no child being exploited on the other end like a drawn or computer generated image.
I certainly don't like these images or the fact that other people like them but that's no reason to ban them.