I prefer resolution over frame rate as long as its locked to 30fps, i have no problem with that. Only problem i have is that Destiny can push 60fps on PS4.

Content would make more sense for their id@xbox program than the current "release date parity" clause, imo. The whole thing is a bit silly. Now you literally have devs signing timed exclusive deals with Sony just so that they can reserve the ability to release on Xbox at a later date. It's hilarious!

I know, plus the clause isnt even consitently enforced anyway.  I dont think it will be around much longer, I see another 180 in the future...

One final 180. Sometime before Christmas is my guess. I actually expected them to reverse it during or before E3.

Entitled gamers finding something to complain about. I'm so happy I want to become a developer.

What I am saying is that people should actually research their view first before making baseless claims.  I know its easy to take something you heard from someone else and then reguratate it as fact on the net.  People do this type of stuff all the time but think to yourself.  Would you rather have your opinion supported by fact or do you want to be viewed as someone who just reguratate anything they have heard whether its true or not.

I am sorry I singled you out but like everyone we have our pet peeves and this is mine. I really have a problem with missinformation and opinions that are made from them.

I do not have a problem with the parity clause if its stated that the developer cannot pawn off a half A** port of a game.  Having content is great but not if your system is going to get the crap port.  The part of the parity clause that needs to go is the part where it forces a developer to release at the same time.

@bolded:  It goes both ways does it not.  MS is getting indie developers to develop first on their system then port over to the PS4 later.

So do I.

I wouldn't say that what I gave was false information because that would suggest intent. What I did was provide a view based on memory of an article written years ago, and clearly that memory wasn't entirely accurate. That's why I provided the link and said (indirectly) I could be wrong. I'm still not entirely convinced that MS haven't got a hand in some of these decisions though.

well.......I prefer 60fps than resolution so I have to admit im ever so slightly disappointed.

"But why did Bungie did not targeted 60fps?"

Journalism at its finest.