Trunkin said:
Content would make more sense for their id@xbox program than the current "release date parity" clause, imo. The whole thing is a bit silly. Now you literally have devs signing timed exclusive deals with Sony just so that they can reserve the ability to release on Xbox at a later date. It's hilarious! |
I do not have a problem with the parity clause if its stated that the developer cannot pawn off a half A** port of a game. Having content is great but not if your system is going to get the crap port. The part of the parity clause that needs to go is the part where it forces a developer to release at the same time.
@bolded: It goes both ways does it not. MS is getting indie developers to develop first on their system then port over to the PS4 later.