RolStoppable said: It's not exactly a good sign if this game benefited the most from the free game promotion. What it means is that it was the prefered choice, but that's most likely because people already owned at least two of the other three games. This in turn means that Pikmin 3 wasn't a game that people wanted to spend good money on, so making a sequel isn't justified from a financial perspective. |
You don't think game companies make profit off games that sell less than $60? Nintendo has been releasing many games at various price points. Let's just do some math here. If Nintendo sells 1.5million Pikmin 3 games lifetime, and a third of those sales are at the full price point, while the other 2/3s are at about $30 average, then Nintendo will have grossed about 30,000,000 + 30,000,000 = $60,000,000. You really think the game costed $60million to make?