By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - X just got a massive downgrade graphically speaking

kinisking said:
spemanig said:
Lucas-Rio said:
spemanig said:
Dude, it never looked that good to begin with.


Good? it looked absolutely amazing, next gen quality, best of the Wii U. Now it's just ugly. Bayonetta 2 looks much better.


It absolutely did not look next gen. People are over reacting because you are now seeing face models for the first time in this game. It never looked even close to as good as something like Infamous Second Son. That's "next gen" when it comes to visuals. This never was.

it did lol. i was shocked at the graphics. now it looks ps2-like. but maybe overall the graphics are amazing but character models suck


Sure, X will look like a PS2 game. :rolleyes:



Around the Network

Maybe the developers realized the Wii-U is much less powerful than the PS4. I am very disappointed with the comicy art style, even the original Xenoblade Characters looked more realistic. Or maybe the game is now coming out for the original Wii instead of Wii-U.

Or the bitrate and compression of the stram was so low that the real game looks much better, since even Zelda looks very blurry and bad.



Everything but the character models.



I wonder if the budgets of some games is getting cut here because I think Nintendo was not anticipating such low Wii U sales, making it difficult to make money on any high budget game.

Devil's Third looks rough visually too ... so perhaps a low budget there. Even Zelda, perhaps they opted for an art style closer to Skyward Sword to save money, a Zelda game with the visual fidelity of that initial E3 demo probably would've cost a small fortune to make.



Treehouse-stream is demoing the game in a few minutes



Around the Network

Seeing as most people seem to have forgotten. This was a still from when the game was first announced.



I'm sure when they show the open fields it will look just as impressive as you remembered.



outlawauron said:
spemanig said:
Dude, it never looked that good to begin with.

If only those words were spoken in any of the FF15 to Wii U threads.


I'm not saying it's ugly, but anyone who thinks it looked graphically comparable to FF15 or any other next gen game is quite frankly an idiot. It's fine for what it is an what it's on, but it's no graphical leap, and it never was.



Many of us tried to tell you that Wii U graphics were barely at PS360 level, a fact that has been proved by 95% of the multiplats and all first party games (compared to PS360 similar first party games).

Think seriously about that: in most DF face-offs, the framerate difference between Wii U and both PS360 is bigger than the difference between PS3 and X360... Wii U mostly lagging behind them both.

After the MK8 technical debacle I thought that people would have understood that, but apparently, not... yet.



etking said:

Maybe the developers realized the Wii-U is much less powerful than the PS4. I am very disappointed with the comicy art style, even the original Xenoblade Characters looked more realistic. Or maybe the game is now coming out for the original Wii instead of Wii-U.

Or the bitrate and compression of the stram was so low that the real game looks much better, since even Zelda looks very blurry and bad.


What? Zelda is cel-shaded, I was watching the stream in full HD and Zelda looked absolutely gorgeous, especially since it was being run in-engine.

Also here's the character models from the Wii Xenoblade Chronicles: 

That is not realistic



It was never as beautiful as people here tend to exaggerate, it looks like an average PS3 game, visually. I dont mind as long as it plays well, but it never looked as pretty as its been hyped to be.