| Pipedream24 said: Many people give Microsoft hell for dropping support for the original xbox after 4 years. Sony just did it to the Vita after two years and they won E3. Very interesting.... |
Welcome to VG and to the internet. That's how most people are on here.
I'm sorry but ya can't win E3 with no gameplay, that's why for me Sony won. They had lots of gameplay and more exclusives. Yes they talked about tv and movies but it was a fraction of the show. Reason why people hated it last year was again no gameplay and they spent 90% of it talking about Movies and TV. Sony spent most of the time showing gameplay and introducing new games. It's very close but if you take bias out of the equation and compare each one for what they brought Sony was the clear winner. Albeit not by much.
http://www.youtube.com/v/AoOOpLpcF28 http://www.youtube.com/v/CphFZGH5030
All Hail the Jester King. The King is back, and I am still a dirty girl prof ;)
ironmanDX said:
Lol? 1 game pushed it above other conferences?
Ridiculous. |
Nothing x1 showed looks or will be near as good as a from software rpg.................
34,490
| Pipedream24 said: Many people give Microsoft hell for dropping support for the original xbox after 4 years. Sony just did it to the Vita after two years and they won E3. Very interesting.... |
Not to mention most of what I saw were multiplats and CGI.... Oh and TV!! Hypocrisy.
| Mr Puggsly said: Few if any new 1st party IPs, numerious console exclusives are also PC, lots of multiplats, and too much time wasted on TV crap. In my opinion, MS had the better show. Why? Crackdown! |
wut? LBP3, Far Cry 4 where you don't need to even own the game to play with your friends, Bloodborne, more indie blitz, even more exclusive content for Destiny, standalone Infamous, Suda 41 IP, new PS4 SKU, PS TV (PS4 remote play), explanation of PS Now, etc. >>>>>> multiplat, multiplat, multiplat, remaster, multiplat, multiplat, game we already knew was coming, multiplat, multiplat, finally a new exlusive.
Yea...they took 20 whole minutes, out of a 2 hour conference, to talk about some Vita stuff and TV content, but the the other hour and 40 minutes was just haymaker after haymaker
You can tell how good Sony's conference was by some of these comments. Sony should be proud.
TheBoneCollector said:
|
Suuuuure if it makes you happy :) You know it is really a matter of oppinion right and for other people Halo MMC + Fable Legends + Forza + Crackdown + Phantom Dust + etc > these Sony exclusives, more gameplay or not...
I also have to say that I have if no interrested at all to UC4 (which is just a tomb raider with gun imo) and LBP.
34,490 
| Nicklesbe said: I'm sorry but ya can't win E3 with no gameplay, that's why for me Sony won. They had lots of gameplay and more exclusives. Yes they talked about tv and movies but it was a fraction of the show. Reason why people hated it last year was again no gameplay and they spent 90% of it talking about Movies and TV. Sony spent most of the time showing gameplay and introducing new games. It's very close but if you take bias out of the equation and compare each one for what they brought Sony was the clear winner. Albeit not by much. |
I admittedly missed the start of the Sony conference but Sony a more exclusives?
Really?
Dunno, Sony got more big exclusives.
UC4
LBP3
Blood Born
No Man's Sky timed exclusive.
MS's conference format was better. Shorter and to the point.
But Sony won in the games department.
No troll is too much for me to handle. I rehabilitate trolls, I train people. I am the Troll Whisperer.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
