bananaking21 said: Sony 2006. they basically told their fanbase to get two jobs to get the PS3. |
And MS said to stick with 360 if you don't have good internet. A lot of people either live in rural areas so just don't get internet, period (that's a big middle finger to them) or can't afford good internet, on top of other billing priorities (you know, mortgage/rent, electricity....the essentials). In a way, that is like saying "get a second job to afford good internet to play XBone". That may be a reach on the second point, but I don't think it's stretching it too far. So in one statement, MS told consumers to screw off....twice.
And if someone says "if you can't afford internet, you shouldn't be playing video games"...you should be able to play video games without internet. End of story.
That being said, Sony made their arrogant statements from a position of absolute dominance. 250M+ units sold between the last two gens, and the competition, total, sold less than 100M, across the Saturn, Dreamcast, N64, GCN, and Xbox. Although what they were trying to sell was ludicrous, the arrogance in of itself was justified, for lack of a better term. Like, if Jordan said he was the best, he'd have the proof to back it up. MS, on the other hand, has no grounds to make such statements