By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales Discussion - IGN Confirmed - inFamous: Second Son surpassed 1 million copies sold 9 days after global launch

Still waiting for the appologies for OP and Grubler... People come bursting like jerks and when proved wrong they just vanish.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
tres said:
fps_d0minat0r said:


Because not everyone likes to be short sighted.

has nothing to do with being short sighted its truth avoidance.   

when you are speaking of whats present now talking about whats to come  is irrelevant especially when youre talking about a singular subject 

lol you wish to disregard the rest of the generation and accuse me of truth avoidance... short sighted indeed.

Did you learn nothing at all from 360/ps3? nothing at all?



DonFerrari said:
Still waiting for the appologies for OP and Grubler... People come bursting like jerks and when proved wrong they just vanish.


Reading last week's thread. Jlmurph wanted insiderp to be banned. 

Oh well. Another day in Vgchartz.



Realisation said:
DonFerrari said:
Still waiting for the appologies for OP and Grubler... People come bursting like jerks and when proved wrong they just vanish.


Reading last week's thread. Jlmurph wanted insiderp to be banned. 

Oh well. Another day in Vgchartz.


And people use the same arguments over and over and when proved wrong move to a new thread and repeat from the beggining, never aknowleding they are wrong, always parading on a high horse.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

THAT bad, huh? Nevermind. Anyways, nice to meet you bud.

 



Around the Network

@kowen have sony put the announcement on the Page you linked or we can scrapp that page as source?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

DonFerrari said:
Realisation said:
DonFerrari said:
Still waiting for the appologies for OP and Grubler... People come bursting like jerks and when proved wrong they just vanish.


Reading last week's thread. Jlmurph wanted insiderp to be banned. 

Oh well. Another day in Vgchartz.


And people use the same arguments over and over and when proved wrong move to a new thread and repeat from the beggining, never aknowleding they are wrong, always parading on a high horse.

ohh please, insiderp is still full of shit. their numbers were wrong. they guessed, came close, but were wrong. they said infamous sold 1 million as of the 28th, meaning it sold so in its first week on the market. Sony said it sold so in 9 days. 

insiderp guesses these numbers and post them as if they got a souce. just because they were close doesnt mean they are redeemed



bananaking21 said:
DonFerrari said:
Realisation said:
DonFerrari said:
Still waiting for the appologies for OP and Grubler... People come bursting like jerks and when proved wrong they just vanish.


Reading last week's thread. Jlmurph wanted insiderp to be banned. 

Oh well. Another day in Vgchartz.


And people use the same arguments over and over and when proved wrong move to a new thread and repeat from the beggining, never aknowleding they are wrong, always parading on a high horse.

ohh please, insiderp is still full of shit. their numbers were wrong. they guessed, came close, but were wrong. they said infamous sold 1 million as of the 28th, meaning it sold so in its first week on the market. Sony said it sold so in 9 days. 

insiderp guesses these numbers and post them as if they got a souce. just because they were close doesnt mean they are redeemed

Since OP haven't mentioned insiderp and grubler got accused of being related to it (both wrong) I don't see the relation. And yes keep using insiderp as source would fall in the same cycle I cited. Don't think they are redeemed nor that it should be totally disregarded because it was posted by them (unless it's a absurd rumour).





duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Hilarious seeing all the people say this is a lie. IGN just posted an article about it there. How does it feel now?



DonFerrari said:
bananaking21 said:

ohh please, insiderp is still full of shit. their numbers were wrong. they guessed, came close, but were wrong. they said infamous sold 1 million as of the 28th, meaning it sold so in its first week on the market. Sony said it sold so in 9 days. 

insiderp guesses these numbers and post them as if they got a souce. just because they were close doesnt mean they are redeemed

Since OP haven't mentioned insiderp and grubler got accused of being related to it (both wrong) I don't see the relation. And yes keep using insiderp as source would fall in the same cycle I cited. Don't think they are redeemed nor that it should be totally disregarded because it was posted by them (unless it's a absurd rumour).

ahh ok, i thought you were talking about insiderp.

 

regarding the OP, i dont think anybody attacked him, but they (and me) were catious as to the source of the info. the article didnt even have a source. so it was reasonable for people to be skeptical.