I'm a console gamer and dont play PC games - EVER!

PC get better graphics - however, I feel in a trade-off for a little bit of quality.

I don't mean graphic or visual quality, or gameplay quality for that matter.

I mean quality like environmental quality such as Harsh DRM rules, buggy online launches, alpha-beta released games.

and mainly lack of exclusive, BIG AAA single player/story based games.

So what if Sony and Microsoft were to release their AAA story games, or the story/campaign sections of their biggest games on PC,

but around 3/4 years after initial release.

Its good as you could advertise sequels on your console and would be good at selling consoles to the PC market, 

by tempting them into the next game but 3/4 years early.

And make a bit of money on the side too.

Ofcourse there are negatives, well a negative:

I'd like to see last of us, in three years, release on PC, with Last of us 2 releasing a little after on PS4.
Even some nintendo games, not all, such as rpg's etc. which maybe don't sell as well as they did.

Because one of the points of owning a console is having 1st party EXCLUSIVES?

You do realize that no one would ever buy a console then right? The only reason anyone should be bringing first party exclusives to PC is if they want to ruin their console and stick a 12 foot pole up their ass

This makes no sense whatsoever..

Why stop at PC? They should bring every first party game to Vita.

This is why pc is not the master race.

Wont happen, ever.

This has already happened to an extent with emulators.

Theres no point in doing that. Thats stupid and bad for business.

as everyone before me has stated the negatives outweigh the positives which are barely anything to be honest.
It makes little sense and is partially the problem Microsoft has faced with many of their exclusives past and present.