Please don't post in here if all you want to mention is that you think VR headsets in general (look silly | will be a total flop | are too expensive | are similar to the Sony HMZ-T3 | are not your cup of tea | etc). This thread is about discussing the potential, price and market success of Sony's upcoming solution in comparison to similar upcoming products. Thank you.
Here's my personal thoughts on the PS4 VR headset just announced:
While I was always convinced that Oculus Rift-like VR headsets will be the next big thing, I wasn't completely convinced that Sony's upcoming solution will be successful. I had fears that Sony would screw up certain aspects, making the device seemingly too expensive for a limited usefulness.
But Sony did just about everything right, they did all relevant aspects exactly as I hoped they would, so I'm now convinced that it will indeed be very successful. The most important aspect in my opinion was the interface: If they chose some proprietary connector shit like Kinect on the Xbox One does, it's usefulness would be limited to being used on the PS4. That would scare off many customers, because buying a device that costs about the prize of a complete console, yet can only be used as long as the PS4 exists, would seem too expensive for many. Oculus Rift would seem like the more versatile and future-proof solution.
But they chose what I hoped they would: USB and HDMI, two standard interfaces found on every computer as well. So the great news is: It will be possible to simply plug in and use the PS4 VR headset on pretty much any modern PC. It will only be a matter of time; Sony would be wise to release their own PC drivers, but if they don't, someone else will.
And that means that the PS4 headset will be a direct competitor to the Oculus Rift. PC users interested in VR will be able to buy either the PS4 headset or the Oculus Rift, as future VR software will be agnostic to the actual VR headset being used. This is great, as it means that the potential market for the device is not just a few million PS4 users, but a mass market of billions of PC owners. That will futher lower production costs and make the device cheaper.
Also, the device seems to look quite stylish and futuristic. That might be another advantage compared to the Oculus Rift for many people.
Another (though rather irrelevant) aspect of the PS4 headset is that it will most probably work as a full HMZ-T3 replacement as well, so it will also be very interesting for (the handful of) people actually interested in a "3D personal viewer". In fact, such "3D personal viewers" will probably soon vanish from market completely, as the upcoming VR headsets will be able to do anything they can, plus more, at a much cheaper price tag.
If Sony even manages to release this device even before the end-customer version of the Oculus Rift comes to market, many people who originally intented to buy an Oculus Rift (like me for example) might end up buying a PS4 headset INSTEAD.
But there's also a negative side to being a very interesting Oculus Rift alternative: At similar specs, the PS4 VR headset MIGHT actually be more expensive than the Oculus Rift. Why? Because it's actually more versatile than the Oculus Rift. People (most probably) won't be able to use the Oculus Rift on the PS4, as Sony will want PS4 owners interested in VR to buy their own product. Yet on PC, people will have free choice between both products. So everyone who is interested in Oculus Rift and happens to own a PS4 will be tempted to buy the more versatile PS4 VR headset instead.
Do you agree?











