By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Digital Foundry Next-Gen FaceOff Titanfall

daredevil.shark on 15 March 2014
gigantor21 said:
Why they didn't just go with 720p instead is completely beyond me. 792p is a complete waste of vital resources.


Maybe they wanted to prove the "leakers" wrong.



Around the Network
Aerys on 15 March 2014

Yeah, maybe Cboat was right and microsoft told them " we must discredite Cboat at all cost ! Dont care about the framerate ! "



Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:

 PS4: 17m   XB1: 10m    WiiU: 10m   Vita: 10m

 

SubiyaCryolite on 15 March 2014

Based on its PC performance? Poorly optimized, Source games run great on modest hardware



I predict that the Wii U will sell a total of 18 million units in its lifetime. 

The NX will be a 900p machine

mutantclown on 15 March 2014
kowenicki said:
mutantclown said:
kowenicki said:

next gen face off?

lol


lol , indeed

 

 

 

 


stil.... a fantastic game though.

which is what counts right?

massive seller, going awesomely well and moving consoles.  brilliant stuff

 

yeah, save it for another thread.



trixiemafia86 on 15 March 2014

792p all just to prove CBOAT wrong. Not worth it respawn. CBOAT winning would have been a win for Titanfall's framerate



Smartest nam evila

Current Platforms: HighendPC[rip]/PS4/PS3[rip]/Vita[rip]

Around the Network
trixiemafia86 on 15 March 2014

that source engine must be a pain for modern gpus though, looking worse than killzone 2 and still cant run at 792p/60fps. Terrible optimisation even on PC.



Smartest nam evila

Current Platforms: HighendPC[rip]/PS4/PS3[rip]/Vita[rip]

Jizz_Beard_thePirate on 15 March 2014

So what they r saying is that the x1 cant run a consistent 60 fps on a modified version on a 7 year old engine? Wtf.... Jeez MS.. How much did u underestimate Sony?



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

HokageTenshi on 15 March 2014

Well, most of its fans doesn't care at all as long as it still playable even though its not in best performance...



michael_stutzer on 15 March 2014

This just proves me right again, I said before that Xbone games should be locked at 25 fps.



Jizz_Beard_thePirate on 15 March 2014
kowenicki said:
Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:

So what they r saying is that the x1 cant run a consistent 60 fps on a modified version on a 7 year old engine? Wtf.... Jeez MS.. How much did u underestimate Sony?


No. Clearly this doesnt say that.

It tells us that this game isnt capable, its CLEARLY been rushed somewhat.  Look at the PC aspects.  And the fact they are using such an old engine also indicates they were in a rush and not exactly blowing a big budget.

If you believe that the X1 cant run a game at 60fps then you are being ridiculous, as it already does and will many many times in the future.

Stop being sensationalist and trying to cause a row. 

Yea but majority of the games run at 60 fps is at 720p... Maybe if Respawn sticked with that res, it could have which is one of the issues pointed out as to why they chose such an odd resolution... Its still weird that it would dip that much

Also, just cause its not optomized for PC doesn't mean its not optomized for the X1... There are plenty of games that run like ass on the PC but runs very good on the consoles... They clearly chose that weird res cause they thought that the X1 would be able to run it



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850