Yes, artifacts are quite common with interpolation, particularly in motion and when using computationally lightweight interpolation methods, like linear ones. As I already wrode many pages before, most probably they had to use interpolation, and a simple one too, because the multiplayer version uses the cloud only as hub to route data packets between users, while it uses the players' consoles themselves as computational nodes.

Of course it looks worse than the SP. In my opinion it looks roughly like a native 900p image, so a 1080p native would be better.

But it could look worse not necessarily only because of the temporal reprojection. Maybe the textures (like the Anisotropic filtering!), shaders and details are worse than the SP contributing, with the strange reprojection effect to the fact the SP looks much better.

Again, technically, it is a full 1080p image, but this image comes from a different technique (of lower quality) than regular 1080p 3D image, that's all. They didn't lie. They just didn't tell all the truth!

If the game was just 1080i, then yes you'd be correct.

However gg is doing some additional things behind the scene to make objects on the current frame solid. This seems to be why it's partially blurry.

@Global hence why i mentioned Ryse and BF(ps4 version) as they both are native 900p games. To me these two native 900p games provide better sharper images that are more clear compared to the images provided my KZSF MP. Technically not providing the whole truth is still lying lol.

This is 1080i...

No they are not. First, XB1 and PS4 don't output 900p resolution (in my knowledge), secondly, 900p native monitors are rather rare.

They are both upscaled 900p games. But Ryse uses a better upscaling and ultra sharp SMAA so it's much (very much) better than BF4 upscaling with its awfull FXAA. Still I agree Ryse does look like a real 900p game and not an upscaled one. But anyway I was only using the blurry BF4 for my argument.

Anyway how can you even put Ryse and BF4 PS4 on the same level? When I see BF4 on PS4 I see a native 720p level of sharpness. (When I see XB1 BF4 I see 600p native level of sharpness...). The sooner developers understand that FXAA + upscaling + motion blur is terrible for the image quality and completely destroy the sharpness/next gen wow factor/sub-details, the better.

I guess the simple interpolation comes into play when the temporal blending is not possible, when for example rotating. Another example of stationary vs spinning.

(Pressing take screenshot randomly until I had an image facing the same way, while I'm spinning left on the spot) Not a full screen effect either as the gun stays sharp, selective linear interpolation.

The stationary picture can only be sharp if they use temporal blending. These are the 2 extremes of the algorithm they use. While strafing and walking you get a combination of the two techniques with varying results.

Anyway the stationary blended 1080p pictures still don't come close to singleplayer

Yes. Killzone is doing 1080i +, or maybe 1080i GOLD if you want to call it that. Hence in pictures you only see a ghost behind objects, not infront of them too. In your third picture the circle is solid in the center but is half visible on the left and right. With Killzone's engine the right portion in that picture would appear solid too. This makes the image better, but it does add some blur.

I mentioned those games as you said that the image in KZSF MP is equivalent to a 900p game. Therefore i was comparing your images with images from games that are 900p hence Ryse and BF (PS4 version Z) Those two gmes have a 1600 *900 resolurion. Those were games taht pop in my mind . Forgot to mention Plants vs zombies as that too is mp game at 900p, AC4 on xbox on eis also 900p. Both machine can output a mximum resolution of 1080p. But there are games that fall short of it ,,and as aresult gets upscaled to 1080p. Just comparing teh image from ryse ,, its much sharper and clearer then the images provided from KZ MP and less blurry then KZ MP . Even Plant vs Zombies Grden warfar providews a sharper and clearer image then KZ MP hence why i don't agree the pics from kz MP look closely like a 900p game. To me BF4 looks more detailed and sharper then KZ MP lol. Are you also on Eurogamer as i think i have seen you arguing on their DF articles? lol

When rotating quickly.

Apparently the temporal reprojection works when you stand still and rotate slowly, my former png is from a slowly rotating view.

I agree with you last phrase but maybe it's not only because of the temporal reprojection but it's also because the MP assets are worse than in the SP.