kowenicki said:
BMaker11 said:
kowenicki said:
BMaker11 said:
kowenicki said:
Since it doesnt mention PS4 after all.... Original Titanfall for PS3 in 2019 confirmed. Should do well.
OT
This thread is a bit of a fail really isnt it.
|
I didn't mention the PS4 at all, did I? And with regard to the similarities to ME2, ME2 PS3 came out only a year after it came out on 360. If you're trying to compare it to "TF1 won't be on PS but TF2 will be" in the same manner that ME2 hit PS3 first, then ME1, which, ultimately, was 5 years after initial release, well....ME1 didn't have PS3 code on it. TF1 does.
I think that's a major discussion point that you're nonchalantly throwing to the side in order to say this thread is a "fail". And the cop out that devs keep using is "it's there because it's a multiplatform engine", yet there is no PS3 data on Gears, L4D, etc. and conversely no 360 data of Demon's Souls, MGS4, etc.
|
so you think its coming to ps3 in 1 year and ps4 when?
|
I didn't necessarily say it'd come out in a year on PS3. It was moreso a rebuttal to your sarcasm of "lol you'll get it in 5 years then". I'm not gonna make some bold prediction but just realize that if $50M can't keep GTA DLC exlcusive, if publishing games like Ninja Gaiden can't keep them exclusive, and EA being a company that multiplatforms all of their games (name the last EA Games console exclusive. The Wii ones only exist because they were tailored to motion, which the PS360 didn't have at the time.), what makes you think Titanfall is any different? Because they said so? Ok, SquareEnix/Irrational Games/Watamaniuk/Greenberg.
NDAs exist for a reason
|
there was no "lol" in my post.... you seem to be getting defensive. My post was a reasonable reaction to your link.
you then say you dont want to make a "bold predcition"... and go on to show how it wouldn't be a bold prediction at all with lots of "reasons" and "evidence", its almost certain.
contradictions and empty words is all you have.
I'm not saying Tintanfall or some future game wont go to playstation consoles, what I am saying is this thread proves fuck all (apart from an OP that cant read things properly) and you have nothing to add of any note or new.
....and the reason why the title of this thread is indeed a fail is because it refers to there being a mention of ps4 in the code when in actuality its something entirely different.
|
No, there was no "lol" in your post, but that was the sentiment that came across in your post (2019 confirmed. Should do well)
And I'm not making predictions because there's no way I can place a timetable on when it'll happen. It could come out in 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, but the moment I pick one, I rule out the other possibilities. I'd rather keep the options open than definitively say "it'll be out on PS in a year and a half" (and look dumb if/when I'm wrong). You're the one that brought years into this (2019; PS3 in 1 year, PS4 when?) and that's the bold part if I said something about it. All I've brought to the table is the certainty that it will go multiplatform. I can't possibly claim when it will happen. Especially because my "reasons" and "evidence" (dunno why you put these words in quotes considering the points I brought in are relevant to the discussion and not something I pulled out of thin air) have different lengths of time between their initial release and when they appeared on another platform. There's no contradiction there. You just want me to say "it's gonna happen in [insert year]" which I never claimed. It's not a bold prediction to say "Titanfall will end up on the PS4". It's a bold prediction to say "Titanfall will end up on the PS4 in 2015", for example, which would have been an appropriate response to "PS3 in 1 year, PS4 when?", but not one I'm willing to make because I don't have that much foresight. The difference in the wording is no different that "Nintendo will release a new console" vs "Nintendo will release the Nintendo X in 2017". One is probably, the other is impossible to deduce right now.
And considering the precedent (EA multiplatforming all their games, not being able to trust 3rd party publisher's words as far as you can throw them, etc.) and now the concrete evidence (PS3 code in Titanfall's data) I've mentioned, I think that does add something of note to the conversation. You just don't like it because it makes sense, to the detriment of your position.
And regarding the OPs title: you and someone else were talking about how ethomaz should change it and you, specifically, said "you expect ethomaz to change the title now its proved to be a load of horse shit? hahahahaa". Well, guess what, bud? He didn't come up with the title. It's the thread title in the GAF thread. And it's really only half-false. Not a "load of horse shit" as if it's completely incorrect.
