Again, wow.

You selectively ignored parts of my post, so I'll take that as a free pass to selectively respond to yours

First of all you're just contradicting yourself by now saying Sony lies with PR. Why in your original post didn't you just say something along the lines of "I know Sony has said 10X, but do you actually believe anything this company says? Look at this one thing 8 years ago"? That's a rhetorical question: it's extremely obvious. You don't believe in Sony's PR of the power difference so you looked for a way to invalidate their statement. Since you assumed they always stated it was a targeted difference, you read between the lines and came up with your original conclusion. I easily proved that was wrong, so now you've come up with a new way to invalidate their PR statements.

Kinda ironic considering at this point you state you're not a fanboy. You might not be, but you sure are acting like one. You're saying Sony is straight up lying over and over again about this simply because you disagree with them and eight years ago they spinned some data. You're not an expert at this just because you're a PC gamer. I am an actual dev working on these systems telling you your analysis and predictions are horribly flawed and inaccurate. Plus why in the world do you keep bringing up numbers and such as if you're the one explaining to me? It's also strange that you bring them up since you know I can't give specific responses due to NDA.

By bringing up Pikmin your again showing that you're looking at this from a fanboy perspective. We aren't here to attack you or your system. I feel the need to stress, again, that I'm a big Nintendo fan and own a Wii U. Hey look what I used to have in my sig. You know how each console group on this site has a mega-thread? I used to be the "king" of the Nintendo one.

I pointed the edges out in a joking matter because I believed you said the game had no visible edges. Who in the world said it was a major problem indicative of the whole system? Plus when a user corrected me about which game you were referring to, I apologized for my mistake. I could have very easily gone to Google and found a picture of SM3DW with visible edges, but I didn't. I specifically didn't want to look like I was attacking the Wii U or its games.

No. The Wii U version will most likely be slightly better than last gen. Watchdogs is a terrible example of a next gen game. It really isnt. If you think with the Wii U's power that it will be significantly better, outside of the timespan of two years you're mistaken. After two to three years devs start using tricks to get around the humps of using dated hardware. Even uncharted went through that last gen. This gen the devs will have the power to go balls to the wall with that game.

As you can see in my sig, I've bet Watch Dogs will actually be worse than the last gen versions on Wii U; not because the hardware is worse or on par, but because it's Ubisoft and they have proven their laziness and incompetence with Wii U ports time and again.

Wii U still has a ways to go until it's tapped out, as no games so far have been built from the ground up to push it.

I haven't exactly studied the FFXV footage we've seen closely; in fact, I haven't watched it once since its E3 debut last year. But my friends are very interested, and they talk about horrible framerate problems, and struck objects floating into the air and fading out of existence.

I'm confident that problems such as these will be ironed out by the time the game is released. But "looking at Final Fantasy XV," meaning what we have actually seen of the game and not what we imagine the game will look like when it's finished, I don't see how it outclasses what we saw in the recent X footage, which had no such technical issues. As far as I'm concerned, a decent-looking game that runs smoothly outclasses a great-looking game that is falling apart at the seams by a mile.

Although it's obvious that Bayonetta 2 and X won't be able to stand up to the best the PS4 and XBO can do, and I wish people would stop gushing over their graphics. X doesn't wow me, either, because I've seen any of Metal Gear Solid V. But the graphics don't have to wow me. If it looked like Xenoblade in HD, I'd still be all over it. And it looks like Xenoblade in HD with much better character models, and I can't be any more all over it. If it was in 1080p it would make no difference to me. If the textures were higher quality I probably wouldn't even notice. The graphics are the least of my concerns with this game.

what are these lazy ports again?

every single port on wiiu is lazy because it doesnt run bettter then 360/ps3, it has nothing do with hardware according to some fans. so every developer is lazy on wiiu.
,

Are you implying Wii U isn't powerful enough to handle PS3/XBOX360 games? Super Mario 3D World is leagues ahead of any PS3/XBOX360 game. I've just started playing Batman: Arkham City - Armored edition and the game is fun, but it's my ugliest game I own so far, graphically speaking. 

ever heard of NFS MW U? its the only game that had real effort put in it and it showed....

is there a comparison article about it. did it run at 60fps or 1080p, then if it did then wiiu is indeed a good deal more powerful then the HD twins.