GribbleGrunger said:
impertinence said:
betacon said:
impertinence said:
betacon said:
If you want a console badly enough you will wait, if you don;t you never wanted it badly.
|
A great mindset for any company that wants to drive away consumers.
|
Where does that imply that's their mind set, you can't honestly think is a bad situation for Sony?
|
Selling a lot of consoles is obviously a good thing, just like being out of stock is obviously a bad thing.
|
I can't agree. Being out of stock can only be for one of two reasons: It's selling extraordinarily well or they have trouble with manufacturing. We know it's not the latter so it's a good thing. Being constantly in stock would be a bad thing because it means demand is lower than production.
One thing I've not seen discussed is AMDs part in this. Surely if one console starts selling much better than the other -- assuming AMD also have a limit on how many they can produce -- wouldn't that effect the console that was selling less? More chipsets to Sony means less chipsets available for MS and so it becomes a viscious circle.
|
Dude. How can you possibly disagree with his statement. It's like economics 101.
The best scenario is where supply meets demand.
Sony is selling extremely well, but the bottom line is, if they could make more systems faster it would be BETTER. That's not really a knock against Sony. It being out of stock is a testament to how strong demand is - but it would be BETTER if there were more systems still. The in and out of stock thing is NOT an ideal situation (although it is better than the alternative, which is sitting on gobs of inventory).