Fusioncode said:
It's really not hard to find something to bitch about when it comes to Microsoft. There's a new controversy every week. |
When something like shipped vs sold is a "contraversy" you know you are reaching :)
Fusioncode said:
It's really not hard to find something to bitch about when it comes to Microsoft. There's a new controversy every week. |
When something like shipped vs sold is a "contraversy" you know you are reaching :)
ioi said:
In a 140 character tweet? You are really stretching things here. Like I say I don't really like Greenberg and have fallen out with him in the past but you are just being idiotic here.
Shane Stocks understand the situation perfectly, he is the one making the point and bringing it up in the first place. Don't make out that he is some non-techincal person that Greenberg is trying to mislead because that isn't what happened at all! |
Agree to disagree, he knew he was talking to people that had zero clue that when he said SOLD he meant to retailer. he made no attempt to clarify even when pressed, clear to me he was being dis-ingenius. He knew what he was doing...............
Then his theatre analogy, pure spin.
Greenberg is right the doofus on Twitter is wrong. Sometimes even if you think a corporate shill is mostly a dick you have to admit they're right when they're right. People here get confused by what "sold" means in different contexts so even Greenberg's patronising comment is right.
“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."
Jimi Hendrix
Okay listen, I am the guy who asked him (@shane_stocks) and some of you believe it is me who is misinformed rather than Aaron who was spinning.
Let me tell you now, Aaron spinned me big time and thought he would get away with it. There are two types of figures, SHIPPED and SOLD. Every single time a company releases information, it would either say "sold to retailers, shipped, or sold to customer", not just sold.
He is clearly trying to make out publicly that Microsoft has sold "3.9M" consoles, which in a sense is true, to retailers. But he is mis-directing in the purpose of spreading the figure 3.9M SOLD. No, in my world and in everyone elses since these spreadsheets and financial figures began, it is either SOLD THROUGH RETAILER or SOLD TO CUSTOMER.
Look at the COD: Ghosts figure when it was first released. It was clearly marked TO RETAILERS. Look at Microsoft's own god damn quarter report, it clearly states "3.9M to retailers".
At a time where "Major Nelson" asks "STOP THE HATE", the chief of Xbox comes out and shows to be the ultimate fanboy.
He categorically did not make it clear to me which he meant, in the means of getting the figure 3.9m SOLD out, which we all know is to retailers only, which means absolutely nothing. What matters is the number sold to customers.
ioi said:
No, there is no agree to disagree. You are just plain wrong on this. The guy he was speaking to knew exactly what he was talking about as he is the one that BROUGHT IT UP. Greenberg never mentioned sold, THE OTHER GUY DID. The only reason you are seeing it a certain way is because your point of view is twisted out of shape so much and you seem to have lost grasp of any kind of logic or reasoning! |
There is no way there is a flat right/wrong, only greenberg knows what his intention was. I never said greenberg brought it up, but he sure never explained it properly just gave a vague it's sold..ok, to someone who doesn;t understand there is even a difference... Like most of his twitter followers..
ioi said:
In a 140 character tweet? You are really stretching things here. Like I say I don't really like Greenberg and have fallen out with him in the past but you are just being idiotic here.
Shane Stocks understands the situation perfectly, he is the one making the point and bringing it up in the first place. Don't make out that he is some non-techincal person that Greenberg is trying to mislead because that isn't what happened at all! |
Man, you appeared in like two threads in the last weeks and you have patronized and done personal attacks on 3 users already?? Pezus, ethomaz and this new guy and even threating ban hammer if you were more active??? Please read the rules of your own forum and stop attacking your "customers"

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
| shane_stocks said: Okay listen, I am the guy who asked him (@shane_stocks) and some of you believe it is me who is misinformed rather than Aaron who was spinning. |
I agree but some don't meh, clear to me what greenbergs intention was.
DonFerrari said:
Man, you appeared in like two threads in the last weeks and you have patronized and done personal attacks on 3 users already?? Pezus, ethomaz and this new guy and even threating ban hammer if you were more active??? Please read the rules of your own forum and stop attacking your "customers" |
Yeah kind of odd the site owner is attacking the people who keep this site going with name calling, anyway I should go seems I am a marked man lol. I never said anything insulting just disagree ona topic, no big. It a discussion forum right?
| ioi said: I shouldn't be complaining as all of this stuff is great for VGChartz hits but seriously?! Console wars gone mad ![]() |
Exactly, don't complain.
We're working hard to earn you a living. See it as our thanks to you for creating this community ;)
FlamingWeazel said:
Yeah kind of odd the site owner is attacking the people who keep this site going with name calling, anyway I should go seems I am a marked man lol. I never said anything insulting just disagree ona topic, no big. It a discussion forum right? |
Should be... but if some common folks are protected from ban, I don't think anyone would dare ban the onwer.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."