Carl2291 said:
Yep. VGChartz ladies and gentlemen, VGChartz. |
You fail to see the underlying principle and compare the two events instead.
VGChartz ladies and gentlemen, VGChartz.
Carl2291 said:
Yep. VGChartz ladies and gentlemen, VGChartz. |
You fail to see the underlying principle and compare the two events instead.
VGChartz ladies and gentlemen, VGChartz.
kirby007 said:
No, just no. All they know is what is in their own agreement. Which would be price, duration, numbers of hits and so on, but no info about contracts with the suppliers of the content |
Simply false, again google PCI compliance. Any company that enters a third party agreement is RESPONSIBLE to know the fulld etails of said agreement and what the third party's dealings are with regards to said contract. MS would never have signed off on this without it getting signed off by legal
selnor1983 said:
Look Microsoft werent to blame on this occasion. Thats all there is to it. It wasnt Microsofts contract. We havent seen the contract between Microsoft and Machinima. The one posted online is between Machinima and their Content Providers. Im absolutely sure Microsoft push the boundries like any company. But this whole fiasco with the youtube thing was crazy stupid. It helps for people to have all the facts first. |
And which figure of speech would that be? Hyperbole? Irony? Detractio? Litotes?
I agree there is no proof of MS involvement and Machinima may simply be contractual to function independently.
My only point is don't try to influence the site founder about how his site is going to lose demographic because of the Sony fans. You have an agenda to push, then do it elsewhere, otherwise you're participating in the very same behavior you are accusing others of.




FlamingWeazel said:
|
I did found nothing of the sort you mentioned, but im curious now! could i get a link?
"I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007
Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions
Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.
fps_d0minat0r said:
we will never know for a fact, but I dont believe it for a second that machinima acted in the interest of MS without them knowing or benefiting in any way from it. |
They didnt. They said its a standard contract they use for all their purposes. They simply added in Xbox One because thats what the ads were for. These werent specially made contracts for just this occasion. EA's contracts to its Content Providers has EXACTLY the same wording.
MS had no need to get involved any further than to approach Machinima and ask them to start a campaign using their content providers. This is Machinimas mistake, but even then Machinima say the confidentially isnt for the promotion itself. Machinima and others have obviously been using this standard contract for ages. Just so happens Xbox is on it, so it NOW makes news.
gergroy said:
|
No offense intended gergroy, I simply see you post more about ms than others. I am friends with lots of xbox people, and I'm a sony fan who owned both a 360 and a wii before ps3. But people call me a Sony fan.
I simply don't get along with many xbox users because I tend to call things like I see them and then get into arguments about whether kinect2 being bundled made sense. I'm sure it's no different from yourself, so again, no offense...it's simply my viewpoint.


I could see MS just going to Machinima and telling them to run a standard promotion without looking over the agreement. It's not a wise thing to do...but as we've had plenty of evidence of over the last year or so, MS really doesn't have much control over what's going on as far as there PR and the message they send.
Bet with Adamblaziken:
I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.
| LivingMetal said:
|
| fps_d0minat0r said: You fail to see the underlying principle and compare the two events instead. VGChartz ladies and gentlemen, VGChartz. |
Eh, I simply found it really funny that something as major as the BP oil spill was being brought up in a thread about Microsoft, Machina and YouTube. As in a "Only on VGC" 
![]()
theprof00 said:
And which figure of speech would that be? Hyperbole? Irony? Detractio? Litotes? I agree there is no proof of MS involvement and Machinima may simply be contractual to function independently. My only point is don't try to influence the site founder about how his site is going to lose demographic because of the Sony fans. You have an agenda to push, then do it elsewhere, otherwise you're participating in the very same behavior you are accusing others of. |
Easy fella. Ive been much longer than you. I know the demographics with all due respet much better than you. Point is there was easily 10x more Xbox fans back then here. And they are still fans ( I have them on Xbox Live ), Ive tried to get them to come back. But they wont. They say its to far gone. Is it? I dont know. But I wasnt trying to influence the site creator at all. He almost never posts on VGC. For him to post about this imo shows just how bad this has all become. Id be happy to continue this further in PM. But as you say I dont want to carry on here and appear like Im trying to influence anything. PM me if you want.
Carl2291 said:
|
the impact of the oil spill is irrelevant. The point is that playing dumb didnt work.