kirby007 on 22 January 2014
FlamingWeazel said:
kirby007 said:
FlamingWeazel said:
Compliancy today requires companies to knwo even what their third party contracts entail, if you are in one with said third party, google PCI compliance...........MS knew well what the overall deal was. Again if you dealt with compliance, IT at work this is common knowledge.
|
No, just no. All they know is what is in their own agreement. Which would be price, duration, numbers of hits and so on, but no info about contracts with the suppliers of the content
|
Simply false, again google PCI compliance. Any company that enters a third party agreement is RESPONSIBLE to know the fulld etails of said agreement and what the third party's dealings are with regards to said contract. MS would never have signed off on this without it getting signed off by legal
|
I did found nothing of the sort you mentioned, but im curious now! could i get a link?
"I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007
Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions
Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.
