|
Mr Khan said: Be honest. Are you ninjablade? |
I found this to be funny.
carry on.
|
Mr Khan said: Be honest. Are you ninjablade? |
I found this to be funny.
carry on.
Dream_While_Awake said:
Low risk would be fine I guess. Almost all of Nintendo's games sell enough to make a profit anyway so that wouldn't change too much. I thought by "small" you meant 2D Platformers and puzzles all year... 1) you just mean Zelda, Metroid, X, a potential Star Fox and so on. 2 games like that a year is what we'd normally get anyway correct? 2) I still don't think a 2016 release for the next console would be wise. If you just mean kill the Wii U and not release a successor, that'd be even worse. |
1) Usually yes, but I think with the Wii U, Nintendo kinda like wanted to mostly make big games and is biting them in the ass, that as well as using the excuse of having problems with HD development.
2) And to clarify, Nintendo won't just kill the Wii U and leave it like that. Nintendo could reveal their next console at E3 2016 to release it early 2017. Or push the Wii U a little bit more and announce their next console at E3 2017 to release it during the holidays of 2017.
Nintendo and PC gamer

Mr Khan said:
Be honest. Are you ninjablade? |

Nintendo and PC gamer

| osed125 said: This isn't a doom thread, a doom thread would be me saying that they will drop support this year, and cancel a lot of games in the process. I'm a huge Nintendo fan, been one since the N64 days. I'm just looking at from a more realistic perspective. Plus in my scenario, Nintendo should not bleed money and stay healthy until the next console. I would say though: 2014 could change this prediction, if Mario Kart and Smash make wonders then the Wii U will have a normal console life. |
Depands really can Ninty bring in all the NIN faithfull and haw many of them are there really. is nin faithfull good for 10 15 million.. i dont know.
Another factor is hardware costs, how fast can they drive them down.
And can they actually make or are they already making games the gamers want, enough of telling people what they want.
I predicted early last year that the end of the Wii U support will happen on March 31st 2016, so I do agree with you :)
Proud poster of the 10000th reply at the Official Smash Bros Update Thread.
tag - "I wouldn't trust gamespot, even if it was a live comparison."
Bets with Conegamer:
Pandora's Tower will have an opening week of less than 37k in Japan. (Won!)
Pandora's Tower will sell less than 100k lifetime in Japan.
Stakes: 1 week of avatar control for each one.
| BeElite said:
Another factor is hardware costs, how fast can they drive them down. And can they actually make or are they already making games the gamers want, enough of telling people what they want. |
Did you read my first post? I say that a lot of the things I'm talking about are based on assumptions, with both the console price and the games.
Nintendo and PC gamer

|
osed125 said: 1) Usually yes, but I think with the Wii U, Nintendo kinda like wanted to mostly make big games and is biting them in the ass, that as well as using the excuse of having problems with HD development. 2) And to clarify, Nintendo won't just killed the Wii U and leave it like that. Nintendo could reveal their next console at E3 2016 to release it early 2017. Or push the Wii U a little bit more and announce their next console at E3 2017 to release it during the holidays of 2017. |
1) The issue is that their "big" games like Metroid aren't mainstream enough. It isn't the fact that it costs more money but that it doesn't sell enough. If it was big budget and still sold well, it wouldn't matter. (Like Zelda)
2) So a normal 5 year cycle?
No offense to you because you seem nice but what's the point of the thread then? Your points seem to go along with what Nintendo is already doing. You're just agreeing with them. (Sorry)
osed125 said:
Oh you said RAM in the first post, so that's why I thought it was a joke Just increasing the HDD size won't be enough, because in the end the general consumer doesn't seem to be that much into digital games, and the "hardcore" gamers don't care about the Wii U in general. |
Yeah my mistake with the RAM confusion. Not all "core" gamers need to care about it. With all the new games coming out this year, its bound to spark some interest in them later into 2014. Pretend it's Sept 2014. Let's say Gamer A currently owns a PS3. Gamer A wanted to buy a PS4 earlier, but most of the games on it are also on his PS3. He sees a Wii U commercial. It show cases Bayonetta 2, Hyrule Warriors, SSBU,and X, games he can't get anywhere else. He likes what the Wii U has to offer, but believes $300 for a 32GB Deluxe Set isn't enough for his money. This is where the Wii U Pro Set kicks in. It looks nice, has 250GB of HDD, and it will play the games he can't play on any other console for $300.00 (No bundled game(s)). By then, eShop and VC can be improved to become a great market for digital games. This is just a theory, I don't expect it to happen, but it can be a decent idea.

osed125 said:
Did you read my first post? I say that a lot of the things I'm talking about are based on assumptions, with both the console price and the games. |
All is assumptions, were you making a statment or looking for a discussion ?
Im talking more games people want, not if Kart or Smash work.
Dream_While_Awake said:
1) The issue is that their "big" games like Metroid aren't mainstream enough. It isn't the fact that it costs more money but that it doesn't sell enough. If it was big budget and still sold well, it wouldn't matter. (Like Zelda) 2) So a normal 5 year cycle? No offense to you because you seem nice but what's the point of the thread then? Your points seem to go along with what Nintendo is already doing. You're just agreeing with them. (Sorry) |
1) What I'm referring to is, for the most part, make the fanbase happy. Zelda and Metroid fans have really high standards, they would never be satisifed with a small short game, and if you lose your core fanbase, you are basically done
2) It is a possibilty, although I personally don't expect a single game coming from Nintendo during most of 2017. I say 2017 because Nintendo usually likes to push things a lot, but holiday 2016 or early 2017 makes more sense.
Not really with the Wii U in particular. Securing Bayonetta 2 was a mistake (financially), "X", while it looks amazing, seems like a very expensive game to make and it probably won't make much profit (if at all), too long periods of development. I do belive they are starting to get things a little bit right, 2014 has plenty of what it looks like "small" games: DKC: TF, Yoshi's Yarn, SMT x FE, etc, and I belive they will continue this trend. And the big games I'm talking about that should release this year are MK 8 and Smash (hopefully). Doctor Luigi and NES Remix are relatively good starts. Even though is early to tell, I think they are doing the correct thing this year and they should do the same for 2015 and 2016.
Nintendo and PC gamer
