By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Rate this Game! (Battlefield 4)

6/10 - PS4 ver.

Huge dead zone on analogs.
Long respawn time.
Terrible spawn places - respawn infront of a guy who just shot you 10 sec ago.
Long 30 secounds between matches in menu where you can't customize your loadout.
Katastrofic team balance.




Around the Network

7.5/10

-A very lazy campaign (not that I care)
-maps are shit and lazy except for locker
-3 months into launch and still buggy as fuck
-maps are shit

This is coming from a dedicated battlefield player.



Intel core i7 930 OC @ 4.0 ghz

XFX Double dissipation Radeon HD 7950 356 bit 3gb GDDR5 OC @ 1150 MHz core + 1575 x 4 memory

Triple channel DDR 3 12gb RAM 1600 MHz

Pemalite said:
5/10, average game that is an iterative refinement over it's predecessor that doesn't attempt to break any new ground and coupled with a horrible single player experience.


Add me on battlelog? :P



Intel core i7 930 OC @ 4.0 ghz

XFX Double dissipation Radeon HD 7950 356 bit 3gb GDDR5 OC @ 1150 MHz core + 1575 x 4 memory

Triple channel DDR 3 12gb RAM 1600 MHz

Whats to stop me from rating 3D World 4/10 for its story? Lets rate Left 4 Dead based on its single player campaign too. Lets not be hypocrites here.

SubiyaCryolite on Battlelog



I predict that the Wii U will sell a total of 18 million units in its lifetime. 

The NX will be a 900p machine

next game will be tomb raider and then Bioshock Infinite



Around the Network

6/10- Mediocre and buggy campaign/ multiplayer. Crashfield 4 as I like to call this rushed mediocrity of a game.



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

dsage01 said:
next game will be tomb raider and then Bioshock Infinite



great, i finished em both about 6 months ago.



5/10

Bugged to hell, does absolutely nothing new br slightly better graphics.



SubiyaCryolite said:
Whats to stop me from rating 3D World 4/10 for its story? Lets rate Left 4 Dead based on its single player campaign too. Lets not be hypocrites here.

SubiyaCryolite on Battlelog


Nothing is to stop you, rating a game is mostly about personal opinion and taste.

However, keep in mind that comparing Battlefield 4 and Left 4 Dead is like comparing Apples and Oranges, Left 4 Dead actually has a decent single player experience (Not to mention it's a Survival-based First Person shooter, something which Battlefield 4 is not!), Battlefield 4 makes me want to eat copious amounts of escargo to remove the horrible taste of the forgettible cardboard characters and ineligible story and constrained areas/gameplay mechanics in single player.

DICE should be held on a high pedestal, they did make Bad Comany afterall whose single player campaign was... Bloody awesome. - Battlefield 3 and 4 miss the mark like my cat often does with the litter tray, the games however do look pretty.

The Multiplayer is an entirely different kettle of fish, personally it just restores all the functionality that was removed from the franchise in Battlefield 3 and improves on a few minor things, essentially on the surface it's hardly an innovative or revolutionary improvement.
That's not to say it doesn't distract from the fun factor, but my personal opinion is it's not worth the price of an entirely new game which you will have to buy all the DLC for yet again.

Personally, I beleive that the Battlefield 4 single player campaign is only good for benchmarking PC's, Left 4 Dead is a blast with mates, especially when everyone is on the turps.

How people recommend the game in the high 90's or give it 10/10 really beats me. (I could ask the same question about Call of Duty though too...)




www.youtube.com/@Pemalite

One more day to vote! I'm changing it up tomorrow at around 6PM ET.