SubiyaCryolite said: Whats to stop me from rating 3D World 4/10 for its story? Lets rate Left 4 Dead based on its single player campaign too. Lets not be hypocrites here. SubiyaCryolite on Battlelog |
Nothing is to stop you, rating a game is mostly about personal opinion and taste.
However, keep in mind that comparing Battlefield 4 and Left 4 Dead is like comparing Apples and Oranges, Left 4 Dead actually has a decent single player experience (Not to mention it's a Survival-based First Person shooter, something which Battlefield 4 is not!), Battlefield 4 makes me want to eat copious amounts of escargo to remove the horrible taste of the forgettible cardboard characters and ineligible story and constrained areas/gameplay mechanics in single player.
DICE should be held on a high pedestal, they did make Bad Comany afterall whose single player campaign was... Bloody awesome. - Battlefield 3 and 4 miss the mark like my cat often does with the litter tray, the games however do look pretty.
The Multiplayer is an entirely different kettle of fish, personally it just restores all the functionality that was removed from the franchise in Battlefield 3 and improves on a few minor things, essentially on the surface it's hardly an innovative or revolutionary improvement.
That's not to say it doesn't distract from the fun factor, but my personal opinion is it's not worth the price of an entirely new game which you will have to buy all the DLC for yet again.
Personally, I beleive that the Battlefield 4 single player campaign is only good for benchmarking PC's, Left 4 Dead is a blast with mates, especially when everyone is on the turps.
How people recommend the game in the high 90's or give it 10/10 really beats me. (I could ask the same question about Call of Duty though too...)