So they are instead working on 4k, or is the partnership over completely?


So they are instead working on 4k, or is the partnership over completely?


Well that's disappointing. Had they developed the tech required for mass-production things would have been a lot easier for both companies.


kowenicki said:
They will work independently on OLED (god knows why) and 4k.
|
OLED/4k is beautiful. OLED plus 4k res might push people to upgrade from their 1080p LED TV's.
So whats wrong with persuing the tech? Unless you were talking about the companies then wateva. But the tech is good.
| theprof00 said: Well that's disappointing. Had they developed the tech required for mass-production things would have been a lot easier for both companies. |
Doubt it. I mean even if they get it right first...samsung/LG would soon follow and probably do it better and make it more desireable to consumers.
Shinobi-san said:
|
That's what patents are for.


theprof00 said:
That's what patents are for. |
Patent what? 4k? OLED? Uhm...
they were developing technology gor mass production which doesnt exist


| Shinobi-san said: Patent what? 4k? OLED? Uhm... |
Patent the manufacturing process. They were working on finding a technology to amss-produce OLED. OLED is currently every expensive for everyone who makes it, including LG and Samsung. Their venture was to find a much cheaper alternative, which yes, IS patentable.
Just like you can't patent games, but you can patent process for making games, ie; engines and languages.


kowenicki said:
OLED is just too expensive. LG are the leaders in this and their 1080p is more expensive than the equivalent sized 4k tv. |
Sony even got rid of the OLED that was in the Vita, which was made by samsung I believe


theprof00 said:
Patent the manufacturing process. They were working on finding a technology to amss-produce OLED. OLED is currently every expensive for everyone who makes it, including LG and Samsung. Their venture was to find a much cheaper alternative, which yes, IS patentable. Just like you can't patent games, but you can patent process for making games, ie; engines and languages. |
I see. Then my original point still applies.
It wouldnt take too long for the other manufacturers to do the same.