By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - Sony the Undisputable Winner in Home Console sales?

 

Can PS3 overtake Wii?

Yes 182 34.73%
 
No 254 48.47%
 
Maybe 88 16.79%
 
Total:524
Shinobi-san said:
colafitte said:
Shinobi-san said:
Does everybody on Vgchartz really agree that the console with the most sold units in its entire lifetime automatically becomes the winner of that generation? That's a load of bullshit if you ask me!


And you agree that if this was like a cars championship where driver A wins the first 5 races but then he abandons the next 5, but driver B sums in every race winning 2 o 3 races finishing the year with most points and in first position as fair???, or do you think is unfair because driver A (for whatever reason) just competed in 5 races???

Just because PS3 lasted longer, that's not something bad.


Not saying its a bad thing. I just think its a more loaded question to answer. A straight forward analogy to a car race is exactly what im arguing against.


So we don't count the ps2 sales that were sold when gamecube and Xbox were out neither?? That would leave ps2 at 115 million sales and not 160 million.

I think that if Sony obtain a sale of every ps3 it ships from now until 2018, that unit is as valuable as any other. If having long legs in hardware were so easy, every company would do that. 

I think Wii was the more popular console from 2006 to 2010, but Ps3 was more popular than Wii from 2011 until now, and it will be in 2014 and 2015 at least. In my opinion PS3 will be regarded in the future as dominant as Wii in that generation. And this is only counting sales..., because if we count games, then,  IMO PS3 will be the clear winner (primarly because all the 3rd party support Wii doesn't have).



Around the Network

Yeah I do Believe so. Especially when Sony will do more price drops as they did with the PS2. When PS3 is sold for $/€80-100 in two-three years it will be a lot of consoles sold. The PS2 was dropped to €70 in Europe after 10 years on the market, and was as most popular after 7 years on the market.

PS3 after 7 years on the market cost €200 in Europe, PS2 after 7 years cost €140 in Europe.

I think the PS3 will do less than PS2 in it's full lifetime, but I do believe there is a possibility that PS3 will pass Wii. Exactly how much more the PS3 will sell, in Europe foremost, I am not sure. But I believe 100+ millions is fair to say.

And IF Sony would keep the PS3 alive for as long as the PS2(12 years), that would mean 5 more years for the PS3, I am almost confident it will sell about as much or more than the PS2. But I don't think Sony will.

Does anyone know how much the PS2 sold in it's 7th year(2007)? Would be interesting to compare that with PS3 for 2013.



im gonna have to say that ps3 will eventually pass the wii at some point not only do i believe it but it has to happen in order from my 2010 prediction to come true

but in terms of rating console winners per gen (since 5th) in what the offered overall im gonna go with ps1 ps2 360 regardless of what the sales tell us



                                                             

                                                                      Play Me

Seece said:
Shinobi-san said:
Does everybody on Vgchartz really agree that the console with the most sold units in its entire lifetime automatically becomes the winner of that generation? That's a load of bullshit if you ask me!

Depends what you describe the 'winner' as I guess, it's already very muddy waters. Right now the only basis of Wii winning is that it sold the most hardware. If in the end PS3 jumps ahead, how can you claim Wii won anything? Because it sold more in a certain time frame?


Pretty much this.


It's not a better performance to sell faster than to sell longer.



Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:

 PS4: 17m   XB1: 10m    WiiU: 10m   Vita: 10m

 

seiya19 said:
prayformojo said:
softcoregamer82 said:
No, they won two generations and Nintendo won three as it stands today. You can't ignore consoles before Sony, unless you're a fan boy. But they have sold more home consoles overall, which is impressive given that Nintendo was around longer.


Nintendo may have won three gens, but the SNES didn't pull ahead of the Genesis until 1994 when Sega was shifting towards their next system.

And that is easily explained by the fact that the Sega Genesis was released 2 years earlier than the SNES...

It's completely different from a hypothetical scenario of PS3 outselling Wii.


Not so different in fact



Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:

 PS4: 17m   XB1: 10m    WiiU: 10m   Vita: 10m

 

Around the Network
Aerys said:
Shinobi-san said:
The Wii has won this gen imo and nothing will change that, even when 360/PS3 surpasses the Wii in sales in X amount of years time.

I also don't see how you came to the conclusion that PS4 has this generation locked down. There's no evidence at all to support that claim.

Also, "winning" a console generation is not like winning a soccer world cup. Its a bit more complex than that. Just looking at LT sales only tells half the story. Not to mention that in this case nobody cares about the "record books".

 

The winner is the most sold of the generation, so if PS3 surpasses the Wii, it will be the winner, just like Mario, Sony consoles are long seller.



Imo, i dont see how you're able to see an other conclusion than PS4 winning the generation. It is simple logic,  PS4 is more popular everywhere, PS4 has Japan,  europe, and US at the moment( and even if microsoft manage to win in US, it wouldnt be enough to reach PS4 level ). all the evidence are pointing PS4 as winner of the generation.


Not really. Nintendo and the Wii will still win. Nintendo made a boat load on every Wii sold when Sony was taking a massive hit on each PS4 unit sold. That and the tons of software Nintendo sold with the Wii. The real winner last gen was Nintendo no matter how you slice it or try to change that. Sure in sales the winner may be the one with the most units sold, but sales rarely translate directly into profit. I understand this is a sales thread so raw sales data wise if the PS3 overtakes the Wii then in that context the PS3 won. It was still a loss for Sony that gen. They lost a good amount of money and lost a portion of their install base. 



It's more you trying to change the thread subject and  slice the fact the real winner in console sales is the most sold console at the end



Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:

 PS4: 17m   XB1: 10m    WiiU: 10m   Vita: 10m

 

errorpwns said:
Aerys said:
Shinobi-san said:
The Wii has won this gen imo and nothing will change that, even when 360/PS3 surpasses the Wii in sales in X amount of years time.

I also don't see how you came to the conclusion that PS4 has this generation locked down. There's no evidence at all to support that claim.

Also, "winning" a console generation is not like winning a soccer world cup. Its a bit more complex than that. Just looking at LT sales only tells half the story. Not to mention that in this case nobody cares about the "record books".

 

The winner is the most sold of the generation, so if PS3 surpasses the Wii, it will be the winner, just like Mario, Sony consoles are long seller.



Imo, i dont see how you're able to see an other conclusion than PS4 winning the generation. It is simple logic,  PS4 is more popular everywhere, PS4 has Japan,  europe, and US at the moment( and even if microsoft manage to win in US, it wouldnt be enough to reach PS4 level ). all the evidence are pointing PS4 as winner of the generation.


Not really. Nintendo and the Wii will still win. Nintendo made a boat load on every Wii sold when Sony was taking a massive hit on each PS4 unit sold. That and the tons of software Nintendo sold with the Wii. The real winner last gen was Nintendo no matter how you slice it or try to change that. Sure in sales the winner may be the one with the most units sold, but sales rarely translate directly into profit. I understand this is a sales thread so raw sales data wise if the PS3 overtakes the Wii then in that context the PS3 won. It was still a loss for Sony that gen. They lost a good amount of money and lost a portion of their install base. 


For Gamers, games matter so PS3 is clear winnner in terms of IP's and games library when comapared to Wii. Nintendo might have have got money from Wii but they lost hardcore gamers which is not possible to get back easliy but Sony can make money back from PS3 in the long run and can offset from PS4 but Nintendo cannot get hardcore gamers easily which can be proved from Wii U.

Also we should consider the fact that Wii was a lot cheper and PS3 was expensive so PS3 did great even though it priced very high and looking to reach Wii numbers.



GAMING is not about spending hours to pass/waste our time just for fun,

its a Feeling/Experience about a VIRTUAL WORLD we can never be in real, and realizing some of our dreams (also creating new ones).

So, Feel Emotions, Experience Adventure/Action, Challenge Game, Solve puzzles and Have fun.

PlayStation is about all-round "New experiences" using new IP's to provide great diversity for everyone.

Xbox is always about Online and Shooting.

Nintendo is always about Fun games and milking IP's.

Seece said:
Shinobi-san said:
Does everybody on Vgchartz really agree that the console with the most sold units in its entire lifetime automatically becomes the winner of that generation? That's a load of bullshit if you ask me!

Depends what you describe the 'winner' as I guess, it's already very muddy waters. Right now the only basis of Wii winning is that it sold the most hardware. If in the end PS3 jumps ahead, how can you claim Wii won anything? Because it sold more in a certain time frame?

Possibly yes.

What if the PS3 surpasses the wii in the year 2020 or beyond (using an extreme example here) how relevant is that to "winning the 7th(?) console generation"? When most of the sales you needed to catch up to the wii occured well after the next gen happend? What if in future generations we have even more extremes happen...are we just going to say well you know PS6 sold more than the WiiME 50 years later...it obviously won that generation. Seems a bit silly to me.

Personally i think in some generations we have clear winners and in others we dont. Last gen is one of those tricky ones where all three consoles "won" in some way.

If we look at the lifetime of the generation, the Wii won that. If we look at the lifetime of the consoles..then the PS3 has a possibility of winning that. If we look at profits then either Wii or 360 won that. Theres just so many factors that come into play here. I dont think a blanket definition like "most units sold EVER of all time" sufficiently covers the question of winner of the generation. Not necessarily saying i have the best definition...but thats my take on it.



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|

Seece said:
Shinobi-san said:
Does everybody on Vgchartz really agree that the console with the most sold units in its entire lifetime automatically becomes the winner of that generation? That's a load of bullshit if you ask me!

Depends what you describe the 'winner' as I guess, it's already very muddy waters. Right now the only basis of Wii winning is that it sold the most hardware. If in the end PS3 jumps ahead, how can you claim Wii won anything? Because it sold more in a certain time frame?

Let's see.

1. Profit Margins

2. Software sales