By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Geoff Keighley says Reggie set to deliver "World Premiere" UPDATE Reggie has a folder?!/twitter pics up

Aielyn said:
I've mentioned this in the "could it be Zelda?" thread, but figured it's worth raising here, to make people think.

Everyone's asking "what could they show off to VGX?". The correct question isn't that, but "why are they going to VGX, rather than just doing a Nintendo Direct?"

To anybody suggesting possibilities for what they might be showing, you need to be able to answer that question. Why would Nintendo go to VGX to announce Cranky Kong, when they could hold a Donkey Kong Country Nintendo Direct? Why would they go to VGX to reveal the new Zelda (when it's mostly an American event), when they could have a Zelda Direct extravaganza?

I wouldn't pose this question about events that Nintendo have typically attended, like E3, or even events they attend once in a while, like TGS. But they've never attended, or really even paid attention to, the Video Game Awards. So why are they having a special event at this one?

Why?  Have you seen Wii U sales?  Too much of the market don't know it exists and that it's actually a really good system.  And Zelda could be revealed at a US focused event - Zelda has a very small following in Japan.  It's pretty much a western game.



Around the Network
TheLastStarFighter said:
Why?  Have you seen Wii U sales?  Too much of the market don't know it exists and that it's actually a really good system.  And Zelda could be revealed at a US focused event - Zelda has a very small following in Japan.  It's pretty much a western game.

The vast majority of the audience won't be watching VGX, either. And to reach most of them, the best solution is actually advertising.

I find it very funny, though, that you've just portrayed exactly the stereotype most people have of Americans - thinking that everything is about them. The US is one country. What about the REST of the west? For some reason, Americans think "western = US"...

Notice that I said that E3 would be different - E3 is watched by the whole world. VGX is an American event, for Americans.

And like I said, the question is "why do it at VGX?". If the issue was trying to get more awareness, there are much more efficient methods for something as well-known as Zelda.

Let me try putting it another way - why hold off on showing Zelda at E3, at TGS, at Gamescom, at all of the other events before now, only to make the "World premiere" of such an important game on an American show? It would be different if they had begun teasing it ahead of time, and announced a Nintendo Direct to occur around the same time for other countries.

And there's also the "why would Reggie be the one to unveil it?" part - it's Zelda. Miyamoto or Aonuma would be the ones unveiling it.

No, this is squarely targetted at American audiences. In my opinion, this isn't going to be one of Nintendo's primary franchises (except, perhaps, Metroid - and even that, I find unlikely).



Aielyn said:
TheLastStarFighter said:
Why?  Have you seen Wii U sales?  Too much of the market don't know it exists and that it's actually a really good system.  And Zelda could be revealed at a US focused event - Zelda has a very small following in Japan.  It's pretty much a western game.

The vast majority of the audience won't be watching VGX, either. And to reach most of them, the best solution is actually advertising.

The vast majority of the audience don't watch any one event, but this event does have the single biggest TV coverage of anything video game related.

I find it very funny, though, that you've just portrayed exactly the stereotype most people have of Americans - thinking that everything is about them. The US is one country. What about the REST of the west? For some reason, Americans think "western = US"...

I'm not American, and I don't think everything is about them.  However, that one country makes up over 55% of the sales of typical Zelda titles such as OoT.  If you are going to focus a reveal on one market, that would be the one.

Notice that I said that E3 would be different - E3 is watched by the whole world. VGX is an American event, for Americans.

E3 is as much American as VGX, and it actually is watched by very few people.  The COVERAGE of e3 is watched by many through media - that is the same as VGX.  I don't know if you've watched in the past, but I'm sure you've heard of The Last of Us.

And like I said, the question is "why do it at VGX?". If the issue was trying to get more awareness, there are much more efficient methods for something as well-known as Zelda.

What is more effecient than getting free advertising making an announcement on a show watched by a bunch of videogame enthusiasts?

Let me try putting it another way - why hold off on showing Zelda at E3, at TGS, at Gamescom, at all of the other events before now, only to make the "World premiere" of such an important game on an American show? It would be different if they had begun teasing it ahead of time, and announced a Nintendo Direct to occur around the same time for other countries.

They held off at previous events revealing Zelda because they wanted to focus on the fall titles Mario3D and Zelda WWHD.  Revealing the far superior Zelda U before WW was out would have made it seem lame.

And there's also the "why would Reggie be the one to unveil it?" part - it's Zelda. Miyamoto or Aonuma would be the ones unveiling it.

Reggie announced Zelda: ALBW.

No, this is squarely targetted at American audiences. In my opinion, this isn't going to be one of Nintendo's primary franchises (except, perhaps, Metroid - and even that, I find unlikely).

Sony has used VGX very effectively to launch titles the last few years. It's about time Nintendo catches on.  Core gamers are ignoring Wii U right now, and the best way to get their attention would be to show a mature, core title that will get them to ooooh and ahhhhh.  A mature styled Zelda would be perfect. Imagine the reaction of those who have scoffed at Nintendo if a Zelda U was shown that blew away anything we have seen to date, visually.  Coverage in other media would soon follow, but an event-style reveal of a Nintendo flagship would be a perfect way to kick things off.

Not saying it WILL be Zelda U at this event, but I do think it makes perfect sense... unlike your entire response, which makes absolutely no sense.  In fact, the biggest reason I think it won't be Zelda is Nintendo has been absolutely stupid with reveals of the Wii U and all of its software.  The marketing and promotion has been nothing short of brutal.  They could reveal a major must-have title at this event... but that would make too much sense.



Nintendo fans, brace yourself!!




chriscox1121 said:

Nintendo fans, brace yourself!!

While Xbots and Playhards were busy gazing at their "amazing" dog fur in Call of Doggie, and while PC nerds drool over the wolf fur in the Witcher 3...

Nintendo's taking it to the next level by introducing Cranky Kong and blending fuzzy fur with sexy hair (beard). Cranky Kong is the only true next gen.



Around the Network

Reggies Zelda jacket is pure awesomeness

 

Yes i agree with starfighter a mature Zelda would be indeed awesome. Especially zelda fans are the truest Nintendo fans who are really caring and fighting to get the word Out. Zelda fans vocal about Zelda is the best advertising.



In the meantime F-Zero fans cry out in the corner.



Hoping for a new console that only does 4k games. Then the other brand fanboys will say that it is about the games and not graphics.



Getting an XBOX One for me is like being in a bad relationship but staying together because we have kids. XBone we have 20000+ achievement points, 2+ years of XBL Gold and 20000+ MS points. I think its best we stay together if only for the MS points.

Nintendo Treehouse is what happens when a publisher is confident and proud of its games and doesn't need to show CGI lies for five minutes.

-Jim Sterling

curl-6 said:
DanneSandin said:
curl-6 said:

True. I'll become known on VGChartz as the guy who's always wrong, but I'd sacrifice that for an awesome Zelda in 2014!

Oh no, I think that title belongs to me ;)

What were your horribly wrong predictions?

Oh so many... I've eaten crow over SM3DW (I thought Sonic LW looked better at e3) and I've been off on quite some PS4/X1 predictions as well...



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

JGarret said:



What can I say? I don't believe one can resuscitate a corpse, so better to make games for the system people actually play.