Flawless comparison.

There's more to graphics than resolution. I'd like to see a fair comparison at the same resolution and frames per second. I'm betting they're identical.

http://www.theverge.com/2013/11/29/5155726/next-gen-supplementary-piece

Last one is Ghosts. If you still cant see the difference Im sorry but you need to have your eyes checked. 

Comparing Ghosts is like Comparing the two ugly girls at the prom.

While one might be prettier, they still look like their ugly step sisters (the PS360 versions)

Let us wait until the next round of AAA third party games come out for our comparisons, not the launch stuff.

The real question is why people dont accept the gap between PS4 and Xbone?

Players accepted the fact PS2 was less powerful than Xbox and had often less beautiful games even if the difference was not as big, but it seems microsoft fans cant, they are in denial ...

Maybe everyone should wait for the respective first party studios to release games to compare. A third party's aim is to get the game looking as good as it can whilst still being similar to all other versions to try and maximise sales. Plus Ghosts looks like garbage compared to a lot of other games.

You don't understand what I'm say. Halo 4 looked better than Killzone, even though Zillzone was higher resolution. Resolution is only one piece of the overall pie. It's not the entire pie. The only difference between PS4 and Xbone Ghosts is resolution. That's not that big of a deal IMO.

It's simple, same game with better resolution > >>>>>>>>>>>same game with much lower resolution

125% more pixels is a huge deal.

Unless if you like awful shimmering

If you add mods to that then it even looks better than *insert any console game here*.

But shush, don't tell anyone.

You don't see the difference because the embedded images are the same resolution as a PS1 game, if that...