| Soleron said:
I don't mean to come off as insensitive, but aren't a lot of those things just normal parts of life that everyone goes through? Most kids are shy, and they can't read emotions because they lack the social experience/knowledge of an adult. Skills must be developed over time in the same fashion as a school subject like math or something ... you don't start in the 1st grade with calculus ... you need basic skills first.
Well, partly it's that my social skills development was about 3-4 years behind. When I was in high school I could have coped well with primary school at that point; and same for university and high school. At age 16 I could not go to the shop on my own. But I could have got top 1% marks in high school maths and english tests at ~age 13.
But there's just some fundamental barriers there. I retain zero empathy; I cannot feel what other people are feeling even if I understand what they're feeling theoretically. And whenever I do something new I need to write down and rehearse every step down to the last detail. Example. Getting on a bus. I have a book that says: check money. check timetable. wait for bus to pull up. wait for people to get off. walk on. state destination and ticket type. give money. take ticket. sit down.
And without that I could never have just done that. Now obviously once I'm used to it I don't need to check that. But every new thing is THAT difficult.
Also, I believe everyone exists on the autism spectrum somewhere. No one is completely normal. It's just that some are over the threshold of symptoms to be clinically significant, i.e require extra support to be able to cope in mainstream education.
I could not have survived school without the support I recieved, which was in the form of: help in all practical classes; being able to take 5 minute breaks outside the classroom to calm down when things got too much; being able to take exams in a room on my own; being able to change for sports on my own.
Also, is there anyone that does enjoy constant change? Most people have routines, and those that don't live pretty stressful lives. More change means more mental exertion and stress. Change can be good, but I have never heard of someone who thrives on constant change.
More like, if at 11.30 it was meant to be Art and instead was Music due to a last minute change, at age 11 I would be unable to cope or even stay in the lesson. I HAD to know in advance. It's not about liking change or not.
Everyone can be kind of obsessive about something or several things ... we all develop interests and hobbies this seems like something normal to me. For example, I collect videogames ... I have hundreds and I spend coutless hours cleaning them, categorizing them, updating a detailed log of which ones I have and don't have, etc. It is a hobby that brings me joy ... not a mental disorder, but an outsider who lacks an appreciation for such a hobby would probably consider it to be obsessive.
This is autistic spectrum behaviour. From this description you'd meet the criteria on this one point. Categorising them and keeping a log is something I do but it's not normal.
Sensory overload, I would imagine, works differently for everyone. As a child I can recall being really sensitive to loud noises. I would sometimes even leave movies or social events because there was just too much noise, and I felt overwhelmed. I don't really have that problem anymore, but I don't think my past experiences were indicative of any kind of mental disorder or instability ... just greater sensitivity I guess.
Again, for me it's that it persisted well past where other children would have been able to cope. I STILL can't do group situations. I was in during an icebreaker activity for a course a few weeks ago where you had to state your name and something about you, and I just stayed silent until the course organiser moved on.
Giving patients powerful drugs to cure illnesses that can not be proven to exist outside of a subjective interview from a psychologist is so grossly negligent that I am surprised nobody considers it to be malpractice.
1. There's a massive incentive for doctors to get people on drugs 2. It can mitigate the symptoms of ADHD, Tourettes and the like that commonly present alongside Aspergers, and make the child manageable. But you're not doing the child any favours by sedating them.
One point - it's not as subjective as that. There are given tests with defined thresholds, and they are repeatable by any psychologist. If you score enough overall you are diagnosed. It's not chemical testing, sure, but it's not what they think of you either.
|