By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - For you who think next gen graphics suck...

NintendoPie on 24 November 2013
kupomogli said:

Use first party Nintendo games that aren't X and you may as well be showing pictures off that are marginably better than what the Wii can handle, just in HD.

That's one of the worst arguments I've ever seen. Just because Nintendo knows how to use what they've got, doesn't mean it's bad.



Around the Network
hinch on 24 November 2013
toastboy44562 said:
petroleo said:
toastboy44562 said:

Well they do right now. 

?? for the xbone and the downgraded games probably , but for the PS4 ? you wish :D ,

[Killzone Shadowfall gif]

hahaha keep living in denial OP. Oh and this is  1080p hehehe


1.) that's a cutscene

2.) No more color in that game than Gears 1

3.) Lighting is no better than gears 1

4.) in that game everything is staged and has no replayability

What the hell is this?



toastboy44562 on 24 November 2013
hinch said:
toastboy44562 said:
petroleo said:
toastboy44562 said:

Well they do right now. 

?? for the xbone and the downgraded games probably , but for the PS4 ? you wish :D ,

[Killzone Shadowfall gif]

hahaha keep living in denial OP. Oh and this is  1080p hehehe


1.) that's a cutscene

2.) No more color in that game than Gears 1

3.) Lighting is no better than gears 1

4.) in that game everything is staged and has no replayability

What the hell is this?

Color is how many different colors you see. Like blue, green, orange, red etc.

Lighting is seeing the difference between night and day and particle effects.

Having a staged game means all the enemies are 'prerecorded' like call of duty for instance. they do the same thing/say the same thing every time you play.



DonFerrari on 24 November 2013
hinch said:
toastboy44562 said:
petroleo said:
toastboy44562 said:

Well they do right now. 

?? for the xbone and the downgraded games probably , but for the PS4 ? you wish :D ,

[Killzone Shadowfall gif]

hahaha keep living in denial OP. Oh and this is  1080p hehehe


1.) that's a cutscene

2.) No more color in that game than Gears 1

3.) Lighting is no better than gears 1

4.) in that game everything is staged and has no replayability

What the hell is this?

Do you really need to ask?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Andrespetmonkey on 24 November 2013

These are both open world, Infamous even has destrutible environments.



My Music

Around the Network
toastboy44562 on 24 November 2013
Andrespetmonkey said:

These are both open world, Infamous even has destrutible environments.


ill admit, infamous looks pretty dope but killzone doesnt impress me at all



hinch on 24 November 2013
DonFerrari said:
hinch said:

What the hell is this?

Do you really need to ask?

Looking at his responses, and post history..

No, I shouldn't have bothered asking :/



kupomogli on 24 November 2013
curl-6 said:
kupomogli said:
ninetailschris said:
kupomogli said:
Mensrea said:

Next gen graphics don't suck. :)

Use first party Nintendo games that aren't X and you may as well be showing pictures off that are marginably better than what the Wii can handle, just in HD.


You're delusional.  I'm sorry there is no way could that never play on the wii at 20 fps let alone 60. The lighting and poly alone make this crazy. Sd to Hd is huge.

Except I never said it could play on the Wii, and I did mention the HD.  Here's what I mean about marginably better.  If the PS2 HD Collections were slightly touched up to look slightly better.  So HD and looks a little better, but hardly much of a jump. 

Infamous Second Son looks like it's more of a jump between any PS3  game than any Mario game is to the  first Super Mario Galaxy.

I dunno, I'd say that the leap from Mario 64 to Mario Galaxy absolutely dwarfs the leap from Infamous 1 or 2 to Infamous Second Son.

Oops.  That was a mistake on my part.  I meant any Mario game on the Wii U compared to Super Mario Galaxy. 



Kane1389 on 24 November 2013
curl-6 said:
kupomogli said:
ninetailschris said:
kupomogli said:
Mensrea said:

Next gen graphics don't suck. :)

Use first party Nintendo games that aren't X and you may as well be showing pictures off that are marginably better than what the Wii can handle, just in HD.


You're delusional.  I'm sorry there is no way could that never play on the wii at 20 fps let alone 60. The lighting and poly alone make this crazy. Sd to Hd is huge.

Except I never said it could play on the Wii, and I did mention the HD.  Here's what I mean about marginably better.  If the PS2 HD Collections were slightly touched up to look slightly better.  So HD and looks a little better, but hardly much of a jump. 

Infamous Second Son looks like it's more of a jump between any PS3  game than any Mario game is to the  first Super Mario Galaxy.

I dunno, I'd say that the leap from Mario 64 to Mario Galaxy absolutely dwarfs the leap from Infamous 1 or 2 to Infamous Second Son.

So now you've resorted to comparing jumps between 2 generatios instead of 1 to make Nintendo graphics more impressive?



theleaguegame on 24 November 2013

the n64 graphics are better then next gen.. it really depends tho i dont believe that 720 p is the max a human eye can see..