Xxain said:
crissindahouse said:
and games like mario on wii look also better as they did the generation before wii. just because wii doesn't have ps3 graphics doesn't mean that games didn't improve graphically. and i think if a game releases with good and bad graphics, japanese would also prefer the better looking version as long as the gameplay is the same.
a cod player will prefer cod on ps4 compared to ps3 but he still buys cod and not battlefield because the cod gameplay is the important factor for the cod fan. and battlefield player play battlefield because of the gameplay and not because it looks better as cod. well, at least most of them.
|
No no no.
Dragon Quest remained the same for 7 games before Enix said " we should catch up with technology" Japan didnt care
Pokemon remained the same up till X Y - Japan didnt care
Monster Hunter has remained the same... and still is - Japan dont care.
There is also Dynasty Warriors, Ace Attourney, Mega Man ext
Heres what is different. Western gamers expect a graphic leap EVERY game. Japan tends to create 1 engine per generation for a series and will use that the whooole gen with no major changes between games. So yes gen over gen a graphic leap a graphic leap is expected in Japan NOT game over like over here.
P
|
who says that the majority of western gamers cares about that? do they really need a better looking cod from game to game? or a better looking just dance game? just because developers improve the graphics from game to game in cod doesn't mean that cod players wouldn't buy it without that. but like i said, i also think it is the same for gamers in japan, give a gamer on his wii the same game with good and bad graphics and the version with good graphics will sell better if everything else will be exactly the same. because there is no reason to choose the worse looking version.
that doesn't mean that the game wouldn't sell the same if it would have only the version with bad graphics but we also don't know if that wouldn't be the case with cod. all the cod players i know care only about the things like the structure of the maps, how balanced are the weapons and stuff like that. i never really saw cod players who said that they won't buy the next cod with the same graphics. only people who really complain about that are people who aren't the yearly cod buyers. people who just want to say something bad about this franchise even if they don't play it because they don't like the gameplay and not because they don't like the graphics.
and just to be clear, the topic says gamers in japan value gameplay above graphics and that is suggesting that this isn't the case in western countries. but cod is a prime example why people choose gameplay above graphics. they simply prefer cod above killzone, crysis, battlefield and so on even when all these games have better graphics. sure, ps3 sold more than wii in europe but because of the graphics or simply because people prefer all the games they don't get on wii even without thinking about the graphics?
maybe the majority just prefers games like gta above zelda. do we know how many units wii would have sold if it would have a gta, gran turismo and so on?
i can only speak about myself and i don't think that i ever bought a game because of the graphics. sure, i like great graphics and i often choose the version which looks best (mostly pc) but i played games like dungeons of dredmor more this year than any awesome looking game and the only reason why i bought games like crysis 2 in the last years was to play with some friends online because we hoped to have fun with the online mode lol. not because the graphics of the armor is so great. and if halo 5 and 6 would look like 4, i would still buy it as halo fan a so that they don't have to change my decision about the game purchase but it will be still cool to have a better looking game.