LMAO so much for eyeofcore's claim that the WII U had the superior version.
LMAO so much for eyeofcore's claim that the WII U had the superior version.
The more powerful the console, the worse the game. Logical.
Wii U is a GCN 2 - I called it months before the release!
My Vita to-buy list: The Walking Dead, Persona 4 Golden, Need for Speed: Most Wanted, TearAway, Ys: Memories of Celceta, Muramasa: The Demon Blade, History: Legends of War, FIFA 13, Final Fantasy HD X, X-2, Worms Revolution Extreme, The Amazing Spiderman, Batman: Arkham Origins Blackgate - too many no-gaemz :/
My consoles: PS2 Slim, PS3 Slim 320 GB, PSV 32 GB, Wii, DSi.
I suspected this early on. I bought the Wii U version on day one and I was shocked to find it looked worse than Arkham City. Even the controller features I bought it for were gimped from the last game.
Having owned three versions of Arkham Asylum (One PS3 and two on 360) and two versions of Arkham City (One on 360 and one on Wii U), I kinda knew what I was looking for. Now, Wii U's version of City looked noticeably better than 360's despite the frame rate issues. With Arkham Origins, I noticed right off the bat that something was wrong.
Still a great game but the Wii U version let me down compared to the others. I sadly chose the worst version.
lol wii U should be doing the best then ps3 then the 360.
glad ps4 is simplified, now we wont get crappy ports and it will be the lead platform. no more cell processor to blame.
| fatslob-:O said: LMAO so much for eyeofcore's claim that the WII U had the superior version. |
I ended up buying the wiiu version thinking it was the best cause of the impressions, i iused to blame the developers but now i'm gonna blame the hardware based on the released specs we have, its ok though i'm buying the ps4 soon and this will be my nintendo machine game only.
Nintendo fanboy need to take off the fanboy googles, the wiiu hardware is crap nintendo screwed them over again with making last gen hardware thats inferior to current gen, now nintendo fanboy claim exclusives look better just like they claimed COD, batman and AC4 look better when in reality they do not, infact watch AC4 be the worst version again.


| spinbob said: Nintendo fanboy need to take off the fanboy googles, the wiiu hardware is crap nintendo screwed them over again with making last gen hardware thats inferior to current gen, now nintendo fanboy claim exclusives look better just like they claimed COD, batman and AC4 look better when in reality they do not, infact watch AC4 be the worst version again. |
Ninjablade forgot his meds again...
| spinbob said: Nintendo fanboy need to take off the fanboy googles, the wiiu hardware is crap nintendo screwed them over again with making last gen hardware thats inferior to current gen, now nintendo fanboy claim exclusives look better just like they claimed COD, batman and AC4 look better when in reality they do not, infact watch AC4 be the worst version again. |
As an owner of everything (except PS4 and XB1), I'll say sometimes the Wii U game looks better. Sometimes it doesn't. No homo.
(I don't know when to use the phrase "no homo" at the right times. It's my curse.)
curl-6 said:
Ninjablade forgot his meds again... |
sorry but the hardware is utter crap, to hear you guys keep on defending it is laughable, when it can't even run ports from 8 year old consoles the same, you guys love nintendo games i can understand but you are getting screwed interms of hardware/price and everything else.


spinbob said:
|
This is what, your second alt account since you were perma-banned, after about six temporary bans? You a sad, strange little man, and you have my pity.