Agreed...because if you read MOST of the reviews almost ALL of them praise the game throughout the review. Heck IGN even said it was the best in the series and has finally reached it's poitential yet gave it a freaking 8! Like that makes no sesne lol!

It supposedly has a better campaign than COD: Ghosts os BF4 from what I have read, better graphics, and a great multiplayer so I think people need to READ teh reviews and not just worry about the score so much because the written review and the scores don't add up. Again it is still outside of the Order: 1886 and Infamous: SS my most anticipated PS4 title and will be bought when I buy my PS4!

Review notes don't always show a reviwers truest sentiment, just the experience. Much like actions speak louder than words, a review score is the equivalent. 

 I call bullshit when you give KZ Shadowfall an 8.0. Best in the series my ass. I will still play it though. Something just doesn't add up.

hmm

Who cares about a stupid number. IGN called it THE BEST IN THE SERIES.

SaGa Frontier 1 is the shit! I always have either Blue or Rogue on my squad along with Asellus if possible.

*HIGH FIVE*

Exactly if the series got at least an average of 85 in the metascore region I would've believed them. I never really trust IGN though, just look at the embargoed gameplay and listen to reports. I am more partial to Gametrailers. They gave the game an 8.8 but explained what is wrong with the game as well as what was right. They don't sugar coat things and then just bomb a game. 

IGN is retarded. They don't know their elbows from their ankles. 

It ties in with what I said though.

If whoever reviewed it at IGN feels the best Killzone is an 8, then clearly it is another guy who gave KZ2 and KZ3 a 95 or whatever. It shows how we really shouldnt compare metric systems to such great heights, especially on meta.

And if it is the same person: Then he's just very inconsistent.

I ALWAYS roll with Rougue lol! Man you have just inspired me I will be getting back on that again tonight!