Kyuu said:
|
little did Kyuu know that I was Pachter all along mwahahahahah*cough*hahahaha
Kyuu said:
|
little did Kyuu know that I was Pachter all along mwahahahahah*cough*hahahaha
theRepublic said:
Lol. I like how they are watermarked with your name and VGChartz over on GAF. I am guessing you did that later? |
Yep. I don't believe in water marking someone else's image but I was pissed.
The only way you could access the images is if you came to VGChartz. They aren't available for public searching or do they show up if you just browse Imgur.
The bastard came here, copied my links, and then took the credit for the find.
Turkish said:
Well the neogaf pics do have a watermark "sourced from vgcartz from user adinieken" lol |
The watermark was after the fact.
Wow. Pachter actually praised vgchartz. He also admits he looks at vgchartz for analyzing.
Adinnieken said:
Yep. I don't believe in water marking someone else's image but I was pissed. The only way you could access the images is if you came to VGChartz. They aren't available for public searching or do they show up if you just browse Imgur. |
I would say you were within your rights.
Switch Code: SW-7377-9189-3397 -- Nintendo Network ID: theRepublic -- Steam ID: theRepublic
Now Playing
Switch - Super Mario Maker 2 (2019)
3DS - Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney (Trilogy) (2005/2014)
Mobile - Yugioh Duel Links (2017)
Mobile - Super Mario Run (2017)
PC - Borderlands 2 (2012)
PC - Deep Rock Galactic (2020)
| PDF said: Found this a bit interesting. Some members of Gaf still not loving on chartz after the episode http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=88435382 its toward the bottom because its the main point of the thread. |
There's no reason why they would start believing Chartz numbers now - it's been proven to be inaccurate several times. The notable recent one is 5.5M Pokemon X/Y sales.
Actually, there are plenty of gaffers who want to reference vgchartz for estimated numbers, but they cant as they will be banned.

PDF said:
Not expecting them too, the distrust and hate towards VGC is too rooted in their community for it just to all of a sudden change. Plus many of them their don't think Pachter is anygood. Still, the fact a well known analyst saying the old data is pretty solid and VGC forecasting isn't bad will probably change the mind of a few. |
The old data is solid because they are revised as publishers divulge the numbers.
As for the forecasting, it's hit and miss I would say.
PDF said:
So whats your point? How they do it doesn't matter if the numbers are good. If the numbers are good they should be allowed to be used. As for forecasting you can say what you want, but its Pachter, a professional analyst saying they are good. Carries a bit more weight. |
You shouldn't blindly believe Pachter just because he's a professional analyst (like when he predicted that Fuse will sell 5 million copies):
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=47223387&postcount=1
Where they got the data matters because it's if not their own prediction, then they shouldn't take credit for it. If they're changing it to match publisher numbers, they should say so.
At the end of the day, VGChart's predictions are kinda of accurate in some instances but mostly hit and miss.
| SnakeDrake said: What if Pachter is one of us!!! |
If he is hes probably badgeneome.