Nintendo has started focusing on purely hardcore games since E3 2010. And Nintendo Systems this Gen are just far more better in everyway across the board this gen. Aside tech power, but original 3DS has higher clock CPU & GPU and more shader cores & more open world then Vita, plus the Wii U closes the gap from being so big, by having an 800 MHz clocked HD GPGPUthats does practically everything, leaving an 3 core IBM POWER 7 CPU to just do stuff like online functionality & streaming onto G,aePad controller, while PS4/X1 uses a x86 architecture and an 8-core AMD APU that uses 1 core for the most basic GPU function, while the 7 other cores have to d pretty much everything. And the Wii U does at least 5 times more open world then Lego Coty Undercover, which is the most amount if game world that any home console game developer ever thinks up of. //3DS is weaker than Vita by a longshot. Sorry. And, AMD's APUs are technically just CPU+GPU systems rolled into one, too. Recommended if you're into budget PCs. But, yeah, if the Wii is capable of Xenoblade, who knows what the Wii U is capable of?

The Wii U & 3DS delivers a lot of pretty much the same taste of games as other systems, the Nintendo systems this gen just do a better job at exclusives and new IPs and the like. And all Nintendo had to do was set their sights on Hardcore. LOL //Vita has more JRPGs than Wii U and 3DS combined, which is why I want it so bad. But, Mario Kart 8 and The Wonderful 101 beckon to me on the Wii U...

Comments in bold.

The 3DS does way more post processing of it's 3D photos then the Vita does for it's 2D photos, which means the 3DS has its 2-core 1 GHz CPU clock more higher per core then the Vita CPU, but the Vita does have 4-cores for its underclock 1 GHz CPU. But let Mii give you a more better example: 3DS 2-core CPU underclock at 400 MHz a core, while PS Vita 4-core CPU underclock at 300 MHz a core (pre-install firmware on both. Plus the 3DS GPU does around a dozen of the gameplay stuff like gaseous rendering. The PS Vita GPU is a 4-core 266 MHz clock at 266 MHz, but only 1 core is used, but they can allow to have 3 suspended games at once while have 1 launch game running via a firmware update for Vita, to actually use the 3 other cores, but they've never done it. The 3DS GPU is 1 GHz underclock at 400 MHz. 3DS has more then 50 shader cores while Vita has over 30, but PS Vita does 133 polygons at using a core of the GPU at max clock of 266 MHz, while the 3DS can do 300 MHz on its Micro GPU clcok at 1 GHz, but it's underclock at 400 MHz, so it only does 120 million polygons for games, so basically 3DS = 120 million vertex performence while PS Vita = 133 million vertex performence, for their games. Tr Vita can only do as much open world as the PS3/360 which had Grand Theft Auto with 100% cell shaded graphics and vehicles traveling 25 mph, while the 3DS has Lego City Undercover which has 100% polygon graphics with vehicles traveling up to 100 mph. The PS Vita shows off native 540p graphic games while the 3DS shows off native 240p graphic games. The PS Vita does 60 refresh rate while the 3DS does 180 refresh rate (60 fps per video image, don't forget the bottom screen with the left/right image on the top screen). The 3DS multitask in the background like a PC at all times, while the PS Vita does not.

I wasn't talking about in genre. But yeah, if you talking about genre, then Vita does have an army of JRPGs. And I agree about the Wi U games calling us. Don't forget Star Fox & Bayonetta 2 & Xenoblade Chronicles X & Fire Emblem X Shin Megami Tensei & Hyrule Warriors & Zelda U, LOL.

Whoa there. Slow down! Why don't you just list down the hard specs, and explain from there?

Also, yeah, I find it crazy that the Wii U's lineup feels more...impressive than the 3DS's lineup.