By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Xbox has no freakin' games!

reggin_bolas said:

I'm talking about the 360, I'm so pissed and I feel neglected by MS. Look at what the PS3 has had this year: Beyond (even though it sucked), Last of Us, Ni No Kuni, Tales of Xilia, Dragon's Crown, Puppeteer  etc, etc.

Where are the exclusives on the 360? GoW Judgment doesn't really count; it was pretty mediocre. Besides Halo 4, there hasn't been a solid exclusive for the 360 in years. The last memorable one was Alan Wake and that was many years ago.

Does anyone else feel really robbed? Why did MS just give up? They didn't even bother keeping some exclusives truly exclusive like Bioshock, Mass Effect, real system sellers. Instead they wasted all their money on timed DLC for shooters and sports games. Truly amazing, and the sole reason I'm getting a PS4 and not an XB1

 


I dont want to rub you in the wound. But you forgot two games and one is the biggest franchise for sony. Rain and Gran Turismo 6.



Around the Network

PS3 is still getting exclusives even up to next year. Tales of Xillia 2, and Final Fantasy X/X-2 HD



What I'm currently looking forward to the most is Killzone Shadowfall and Infamous Second Son.

1886 has to little info out so far for me to make a judgement at this point and while I am 99% certain whatever naughty dog comes up with next will rock I will hold off on making it my most anticipated next gen game until I at least know what its called.



This is the Game of Thrones

Where you either win

or you DIE

y2jarmyofficial said:
you got deadfall adventures, and titanfall, beyond two souls sucked gears scored better,loco cycle, zoo tycoon,and others as well


This is simply trolling, not to mention you conveniently lewft off a tonne of ps3 games this and next year. Zoo tycoon lmao.



reggin_bolas said:

I'm talking about the 360, I'm so pissed and I feel neglected by MS. Look at what the PS3 has had this year: Beyond (even though it sucked), Last of Us, Ni No Kuni, Tales of Xilia, Dragon's Crown, Puppeteer  etc, etc.

Tell me how you played it



Around the Network

Why people that mentions Rain as ps3 exclusive don't mention Battleblock theater as 360 exclusive? ;_;

 

Why 360 gamers tend to forget that Stranger in Alda is coming exclusively in 2014?

 

Misinformed people >_<



A bunch of people asked me if I have played B2S, I haven't. I don't need to play it to form an objective opinion, that's why we have gaming journalists.

Are you guys telling me people should not trust the average score of all reputable reviewers before making a purchase? If that's the case, it completely destroys the whole point of a review system.

Why do we bother with gaming journalism if the only opinion that matters is your own?



reggin_bolas said:
A bunch of people asked me if I have played B2S, I haven't. I don't need to play it to form an objective opinion, that's why we have gaming journalists.

Are you guys telling me people should not trust the average score of all reputable reviewers before making a purchase? If that's the case, it completely destroys the whole point of a review system.

Why do we bother with gaming journalism if the only opinion that matters is your own?


So, I shouldn't like a game because gaming journalists said the game wasn't good?



Wright said:
reggin_bolas said:
A bunch of people asked me if I have played B2S, I haven't. I don't need to play it to form an objective opinion, that's why we have gaming journalists.

Are you guys telling me people should not trust the average score of all reputable reviewers before making a purchase? If that's the case, it completely destroys the whole point of a review system.

Why do we bother with gaming journalism if the only opinion that matters is your own?


So, I shouldn't like a game because gaming journalists said the game wasn't good?


Aggregate review scores is as close as we can come to some semblence of objectivity when judging video game content. Would you say the last of us is a bad game? GTVA5? Probably not because of the high review scores. Most people seemed to enjoy them. Does that mean you personally liked playing those games? No. But that's not the point. 

I don't have to play B2S to form an objective opinion about it; it adds some layer of credibility if I have but I don't need to play it. That's why we have a review system in the first place. 



reggin_bolas said:
Wright said:
reggin_bolas said:
A bunch of people asked me if I have played B2S, I haven't. I don't need to play it to form an objective opinion, that's why we have gaming journalists.

Are you guys telling me people should not trust the average score of all reputable reviewers before making a purchase? If that's the case, it completely destroys the whole point of a review system.

Why do we bother with gaming journalism if the only opinion that matters is your own?


So, I shouldn't like a game because gaming journalists said the game wasn't good?


Aggregate review scores is as close as we can come to some semblence of objectivity when judging video game content. Would you say the last of us is a bad game? GTVA5? Probably not because of the high review scores. Most people seemed to enjoy them. Does that mean you personally liked playing those games? No. But that's not the point. 

I don't have to play B2S to form an objective opinion about it; it adds some layer of credibility if I have but I don't need to play it. That's why we have a review system in the first place. 


A review system, that, let me tell you, isn't inmune to bribery.

 

This is like telling someone that you have to trust journalism when more than the 50% of the newspapers agree on something. That's a big mistake. Not trusting a newspaper doesn't void journalism. Not trusting a videogame review doesn't void gaming journalist. It's as simple as that. For some people it works well and help them actually buying games they might enjoy. But for others, they can't stand a rewview, especially when it conflicts with their own gaming vision.