By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Xbox has no freakin' games!

DonFerrari on 04 November 2013
selnor1983 said:
DonFerrari said:
selnor1983 said:
iamdeath said:
selnor1983 said:
iamdeath said:
selnor1983 said:

Hmmm.

I invested alot of time in Unchrarted. Finished 1 and 2. It says alot that I couldnt be bothered to finish 3. I also traded TLOU in for GTA5. Best decision of the year. GTA5 destroys TLOU in story and gameplay. 

Im so heavily biased I paid 300 quid for a PS3 with GOW3 and Uncharted 1 - 3. Sure. God of War 3 is th best PS3 game by a mile.

You think Microsoft cant compete this gen? 

360 started with 7 First Parrty Studios. Xbbox One starts with 28. 

Its game on. An IMO Microsoft start wiith a much better variety  than Sony. 

Pre=order tell a diff story...Lety me add you on PSN......

 

Number of studios is irrelevant, the quality and size of them are...MS may have studios but most are not doing anything of note.. Metacritic shows who has the much higherr rated first party. MAny of sony's studios are 2 and 3 yeams large.....

You may like GTA 5 better then TLOU, but it isn;t a better game, GTA 5, tries to do troo much and is a master of none. LOL @ gta 5 stort better then TLOU........Not one award will go to GAT 5 this year for story, and TLOU is an exclusive, gta 5 can be played on both. What has 360 had the last 3 years?

 

You like over the top action games , thats your preferrence, doesn't make those games better....They are not.


I dont think you quite understand. There are many people who dont agree with you. 

It doesnt matter what you say, or what awards are given. I prefer Microsofts first party games. You saying PS3 games ARE better doesnt make those games better. Thats your preference. 

Its called opinion. 

Im not sure your really ever going to grasp  many people dont likke Sony exclusives as much as you. 

Word of note. Im not an action gamer. I like anything I think is great. Like Hearthstone. Love that game.


There are many who don't agree with you including critics, that's how this works lol. There is a reason a 600 dollar PS3 was able to outsell the 360...games, sony always delivers, year after year. MS again relying on throwing money around at third party's at the beginning of a gen. This time though, Sony has the price and no head start for MS.

You still dont get it. I dont care if people dont agree with me. Critics included. LOL. Thats how this works. Its called OPINION. 

Sony sold over 100,000 less consoles than its previous generation. Has made huge losses as a company and just recently downgraded their expected profits for 2014. While Microsoft has had a record profit, now looking like making the best year in Microsofts history. Posting in 1 quater profit more money the what Sony is worth in its entirity.

So my point is

1. Opinions cannot be wrong. They are opinions.

2. Sony has had a terrible 8 years from a business point of view. And hasnt got better right now.

3. Microsoft has had an amaing 8 year business point of view. And they are breaking their own records right now.

 

Nothing you do or say will make mine and many others opinions invalid. Same as I cant make yours invalid. 


So your point is that you preffer MS games because their company is richer?


Another poster like Iamdeath. No my troubled Sonyfan.

I dont rate Sony first party that highly. Comprendai? C? Do you see?

I prefer Microsofts First Party. There games are better to me. More fun, more enjoyable, less crap. IMO. Do you get it yet?

Iamdeath brought sales into it. Because he cant work out opinion is opinion. And his brain struggles to  understand that its possible many people dont rate Uncharted or TLOU as highly as Gears or Halo.

Would you like a Tic Tac?

The problem is that you seem to also use your opinion as facts some times... mainly when saying one platform have better games (objectively) than others... And you don't need to pretend, everyone knows which plat you support even when it seems incredibly crazy...



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
Wright on 04 November 2013

Dis' thread is still alive?



DonFerrari on 04 November 2013
Wright said:

Dis' thread is still alive?


I was banned for 4 days by saying my friend ethomaz is as ugly as one next-gen (crossgen) game that I won't repeat so I won't be rebanned... So I could answer just know...

But for it to not be a one liner... its impossible to see both current gen and say that Xbox 360 have more 1st parties (or even retail exclusives)... you could say they have better (if its your preference).



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Wright on 04 November 2013
DonFerrari said:
Wright said:

Dis' thread is still alive?


I was banned for 4 days by saying my friend ethomaz is as ugly as one next-gen (crossgen) game that I won't repeat so I won't be rebanned... So I could answer just know...

But for it to not be a one liner... its impossible to see both current gen and say that Xbox 360 have more 1st parties (or even retail exclusives)... you could say they have better (if its your preference).


No one here said MS had more 1st party than Sony or Nintendo.



DonFerrari on 04 November 2013
Wright said:
DonFerrari said:
Wright said:

Dis' thread is still alive?


I was banned for 4 days by saying my friend ethomaz is as ugly as one next-gen (crossgen) game that I won't repeat so I won't be rebanned... So I could answer just know...

But for it to not be a one liner... its impossible to see both current gen and say that Xbox 360 have more 1st parties (or even retail exclusives)... you could say they have better (if its your preference).


No one here said MS had more 1st party than Sony or Nintendo.

If you read right you would see them =] ... but no mather... as we talked before in this thread, any Xbox owner can be happy playing games they never played for the next 10 years (discounting shovelwares, because to end them all one life isn't enough, 1700+ games)



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
blublibla on 04 November 2013

The Xbox 360 is one year older and more tired than the PS3.

So it's normal that it's both selling less consoles, and having less exclusive releases.

Also it's a matter of talent and legacy: Sony has been around for 4 generations with one of the most iconic console (the Playstation) then the PS2, and most of its developper studios emerged from then (Naughty Dog, Quantic Dream, Santa Monica...) while the first Xbox already had few worthy exlusives to follow-up on the Xbox 360, which didn't have as much worthy IPs as the PS3 did either.     

So in fact, if the initial appeal of the PS4 is already stronger than the Xbox One, and more remarkable exclusives are releases first on the PS4, other developper will probably follow and focus on the PS4 making it the future success.



PlayerOfKings on 04 November 2013

Actually also coming out on pc so...